Literature DB >> 18849085

Aversion to health inequalities and priority setting in health care.

Han Bleichrodt1, David Crainich, Louis Eeckhoudt.   

Abstract

Traditionally aversion to health inequality is modelled through a concave utility function over health outcomes. Bleichrodt et al. [Bleichrodt, H., Diecidue E., Quiggin J., 2004. Equity weights in the allocation of health care: the rank-dependent QALY model. Journal of Health Economics 23, 157-171] have suggested a "dual" approach based on the introduction of explicit equity weights. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how priorities in health care are determined in the framework of these two models. It turns out that policy implications are highly sensitive to the choice of the model that will represent aversion to health inequality.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849085     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  When are person tradeoffs valid?

Authors:  Jason N Doctor; John Miyamoto; Han Bleichrodt
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  A cost-based equity weight for use in the economic evaluation of primary health care interventions: case study of the Australian Indigenous population.

Authors:  Katherine S Ong; Margaret Kelaher; Ian Anderson; Rob Carter
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2009-10-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.