Literature DB >> 18843159

Effects of velocity and weight support on ground reaction forces and metabolic power during running.

Alena M Grabowski1, Rodger Kram.   

Abstract

The biomechanical and metabolic demands of human running are distinctly affected by velocity and body weight. As runners increase velocity, ground reaction forces (GRF) increase, which may increase the risk of an overuse injury, and more metabolic power is required to produce greater rates of muscular force generation. Running with weight support attenuates GRFs, but demands less metabolic power than normal weight running. We used a recently developed device (G-trainer) that uses positive air pressure around the lower body to support body weight during treadmill running. Our scientific goal was to quantify the separate and combined effects of running velocity and weight support on GRFs and metabolic power. After obtaining this basic data set, we identified velocity and weight support combinations that resulted in different peak GRFs, yet demanded the same metabolic power. Ideal combinations of velocity and weight could potentially reduce biomechanical risks by attenuating peak GRFs while maintaining aerobic and neuromuscular benefits. Indeed, we found many combinations that decreased peak vertical GRFs yet demanded the same metabolic power as running slower at normal weight. This approach of manipulating velocity and weight during running may prove effective as a training and/or rehabilitation strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18843159     DOI: 10.1123/jab.24.3.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  29 in total

1.  Return to sport following hip injury.

Authors:  Pete Draovitch; Robert A Maschi; Jessica Hettler
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-03

2.  Metabolic accommodation to running on a body weight-supported treadmill.

Authors:  David K P McNeill; Hendrik D de Heer; Cody P Williams; J Richard Coast
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Influence of short-term unweighing and reloading on running kinetics and muscle activity.

Authors:  Patrick Sainton; Caroline Nicol; Jan Cabri; Joëlle Barthelemy-Montfort; Eric Berton; Pascale Chavet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Physiological and Biomechanical Responses to Running on Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills in Healthy Populations.

Authors:  Kathryn A Farina; Alexis A Wright; Kevin R Ford; Leah Anne Wirfel; James M Smoliga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Step time asymmetry increases metabolic energy expenditure during running.

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Eric N Azua; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Comfort and Ground Reaction Forces in Flat-Footed Female Runners: Comparison of Low-Dye Taping versus Sham Taping.

Authors:  Hui Li Alvina Koh; Wei-Hsiu Lin; Pui Wah Kong
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Potential utility of anti-gravity treadmills in the realm of cardiovascular stress testing.

Authors:  Vasvi Singh; Saurabh Malhotra
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®.

Authors:  David K P McNeill; John R Kline; Hendrick D de Heer; J Richard Coast
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Chen; Adam S Tenforde; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

10.  CLINICAL DECISION MAKING AND TREATMENT IN A RUNNER WITH HIP PAIN AND NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL DYSFUNCTION: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  C Nathan Vannatta; Matthew Haberl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.