Literature DB >> 18842687

The dynamic ups and downs of genome size evolution in Brassicaceae.

Martin A Lysak1, Marcus A Koch, Jeremy M Beaulieu, Armin Meister, Ilia J Leitch.   

Abstract

Crucifers (Brassicaceae, Cruciferae) are a large family comprising some 338 genera and c. 3,700 species. The family includes important crops as well as several model species in various fields of plant research. This paper reports new genome size (GS) data for more than 100 cruciferous species in addition to previously published C-values (the DNA amount in the unreplicated gametic nuclei) to give a data set comprising 185 Brassicaceae taxa, including all but 1 of the 25 tribes currently recognized. Evolution of GS was analyzed within a phylogenetic framework based on gene trees built from five data sets (matK, chs, adh, trnLF, and ITS). Despite the 16.2-fold variation across the family, most Brassicaceae species are characterized by very small genomes with a mean 1C-value of 0.63 pg. The ancestral genome size (ancGS) for Brassicaceae was reconstructed as (anc)1C=0.50 pg. Approximately 50% of crucifer taxa analyzed showed a decrease in GS compared with the ancGS. The remaining species showed an increase in GS although this was generally moderate, with significant increases in C-value found only in the tribes Anchonieae and Physarieae. Using statistical approaches to analyze GS, evolutionary gains or losses in GS were seen to have accumulated disproportionately faster within longer branches. However, we also found that GS has not changed substantially through time and most likely evolves passively (i.e., a tempo that cannot be distinguished between neutral evolution and weak forms of selection). The data reveal an apparent paradox between the narrow range of small GSs over long evolutionary time periods despite evidence of dynamic genomic processes that have the potential to lead to genome obesity (e.g., transposable element amplification and polyploidy). To resolve this, it is suggested that mechanisms to suppress amplification and to eliminate amplified DNA must be active in Brassicaceae although their control and mode of operation are still poorly understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842687     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  59 in total

1.  An assessment of transgenomics as a tool for identifying genes involved in the evolutionary differentiation of closely related plant species.

Authors:  Raul Correa; John Stanga; Bret Larget; Aaron Roznowski; Guoping Shu; Brian Dilkes; David A Baum
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  A world-wide perspective on crucifer speciation and evolution: phylogenetics, biogeography and trait evolution in tribe Arabideae.

Authors:  Robert Karl; Marcus A Koch
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Cytotype diversity and genome size variation in eastern Asian polyploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) species.

Authors:  Karol Marhold; Hiroshi Kudoh; Jae-Hong Pak; Kuniaki Watanabe; Stanislav Spaniel; Judita Lihová
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  The large genome size variation in the Hesperis clade was shaped by the prevalent proliferation of DNA repeats and rarer genome downsizing.

Authors:  Petra Hloušková; Terezie Mandáková; Milan Pouch; Pavel Trávníček; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Monophyletic Origin and Evolution of the Largest Crucifer Genomes.

Authors:  Terezie Mandáková; Petra Hloušková; Dmitry A German; Martin A Lysak
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Map-based cloning of a recessive genic male sterility locus in Brassica napus L. and development of its functional marker.

Authors:  Ji Li; Dengfeng Hong; Junping He; Lei Ma; Lili Wan; Pingwu Liu; Guangsheng Yang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Polyploid evolution of the Brassicaceae during the Cenozoic era.

Authors:  Sateesh Kagale; Stephen J Robinson; John Nixon; Rong Xiao; Terry Huebert; Janet Condie; Dallas Kessler; Wayne E Clarke; Patrick P Edger; Matthew G Links; Andrew G Sharpe; Isobel A P Parkin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 8.  Beyond the thale: comparative genomics and genetics of Arabidopsis relatives.

Authors:  Daniel Koenig; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  Centromeres and kinetochores of Brassicaceae.

Authors:  Inna Lermontova; Michael Sandmann; Dmitri Demidov
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  The evolution of Brassica napus FLOWERING LOCUS T paralogues in the context of inverted chromosomal duplication blocks.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yan Long; Baoduo Wu; Jia Liu; Congcong Jiang; Lei Shi; Jianwei Zhao; Graham J King; Jinling Meng
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.