Literature DB >> 18842075

No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex.

Allard Kamphuisen1, Markus Bauer, Raymond van Ee.   

Abstract

We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of the steady-state-visual-evoked field during perceptual switches in binocular rivalry using MEG. Several authors have previously used frequency tagging in MEG studies on binocular rivalry and have claimed to have found a widespread network of synchronized areas that are entrained by the stimulus, reaching up to frontal regions. Moreover, it has been claimed that the results prove that becoming aware of a stimulus is established by increased intra- and interhemispheric synchronization of brain areas, separated by large distances. Our results dovetailed nicely with previous findings such as power and coherence modulations as a function of perceptual state. However, while we also found stimulus-entrained activity across the entire scalp, a phase analysis revealed that the spatially extended nature of the frequency tag was produced by a limited set of occipital sources. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the coherence results from earlier studies are ambiguous in that they likely measured coherence between different sensors whose signals were dominated by the same sources. We conclude that the claims about widespread synchronized networks to consciously perceive flicker stimuli are currently unconvincing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842075     DOI: 10.1167/8.5.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

1.  Differential oscillatory electroencephalogram between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subtypes and typically developing adolescents.

Authors:  Ali Mazaheri; Catherine Fassbender; Sharon Coffey-Corina; Tadeus A Hartanto; Julie B Schweitzer; George R Mangun
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Jens Sommer; Andreas Jansen; Marnix Naber; Wolfgang Einhäuser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Individual peak gamma frequency predicts switch rate in perceptual rivalry.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fesi; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural Correlates of Consciousness at Near-Electrocerebral Silence in an Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Model.

Authors:  Donald E Lee; Lauren G Lee; Danny Siu; Afsheen K Bazrafkan; Maryam H Farahabadi; Tin J Dinh; Josue Orellana; Wei Xiong; Beth A Lopour; Yama Akbari
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2017-04

5.  Early visual responses predict conscious face perception within and between subjects during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kristian Sandberg; Bahador Bahrami; Ryota Kanai; Gareth Robert Barnes; Morten Overgaard; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Does visual flicker phase at gamma frequency modulate neural signal propagation and stimulus selection?

Authors:  Markus Bauer; Thomas Akam; Sabine Joseph; Elliot Freeman; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation.

Authors:  Daphne Roumani; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Perceptual incongruence influences bistability and cortical activation.

Authors:  Gijs Joost Brouwer; Frank Tong; Peter Hagoort; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reconstructing coherent networks from electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography with reduced contamination from volume conduction or magnetic field spread.

Authors:  Mark Drakesmith; Wael El-Deredy; Stephen Welbourne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.