PURPOSE: Evaluate the accuracy and the sensitivity to contour variation and model size of a finite element model-based deformable registration algorithm for the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were obtained for 21 prostate patients with three implanted markers. A single observer contoured the prostate and markers and performed blinded recontouring of the first MRI. A biomechanical-model based deformable registration algorithm, MORFEUS, was applied to each dataset pair, deforming the second image (B) to the first image (A). The residual error was calculated by comparing the center of mass (COM) of the markers with the predicted COM. Sensitivity to contour variation was calculated by deforming B to the repeat contour of A (A2). The sensitivity to the model size was calculated by reducing the number of nodes (B', A', A2') and repeating the analysis. RESULTS: The average residual error of the registration for B to A and B to A2 was 0.22 cm (SD: 0.08 cm) and 0.24 cm (SD: 0.09 cm), respectively. The average residual error of the registration of B' to A' and B' to A2' was 0.22 cm (SD: 0.10 cm) and 0.25 cm (SD: 0.10 cm), respectively. The average time to run MORFEUS on the standard and reduced model was 3606 s (SD: 7788 s) and 56 s (SD: 16 s), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the algorithm, equal to the image voxel size, is not affected by intraobserver contour variability or model size. Reducing the model size significantly increases algorithm efficiency.
PURPOSE: Evaluate the accuracy and the sensitivity to contour variation and model size of a finite element model-based deformable registration algorithm for the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were obtained for 21 prostate patients with three implanted markers. A single observer contoured the prostate and markers and performed blinded recontouring of the first MRI. A biomechanical-model based deformable registration algorithm, MORFEUS, was applied to each dataset pair, deforming the second image (B) to the first image (A). The residual error was calculated by comparing the center of mass (COM) of the markers with the predicted COM. Sensitivity to contour variation was calculated by deforming B to the repeat contour of A (A2). The sensitivity to the model size was calculated by reducing the number of nodes (B', A', A2') and repeating the analysis. RESULTS: The average residual error of the registration for B to A and B to A2 was 0.22 cm (SD: 0.08 cm) and 0.24 cm (SD: 0.09 cm), respectively. The average residual error of the registration of B' to A' and B' to A2' was 0.22 cm (SD: 0.10 cm) and 0.25 cm (SD: 0.10 cm), respectively. The average time to run MORFEUS on the standard and reduced model was 3606 s (SD: 7788 s) and 56 s (SD: 16 s), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the algorithm, equal to the image voxel size, is not affected by intraobserver contour variability or model size. Reducing the model size significantly increases algorithm efficiency.
Authors: S Reaungamornrat; W P Liu; A S Wang; Y Otake; S Nithiananthan; A Uneri; S Schafer; E Tryggestad; J Richmon; J M Sorger; J H Siewerdsen; R H Taylor Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Rachel B Ger; Jinzhong Yang; Yao Ding; Megan C Jacobsen; Clifton D Fuller; Rebecca M Howell; Heng Li; R Jason Stafford; Shouhao Zhou; Laurence E Court Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Cynthia L Eccles; Laura A Dawson; Joanne L Moseley; Kristy K Brock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Helen Xu; Andras Lasso; Peter Guion; Axel Krieger; Aradhana Kaushal; Anurag K Singh; Peter A Pinto; Jonathan Coleman; Robert L Grubb; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Cynthia Menard; Louis L Whitcomb; Gabor Fichtinger Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Jennifer Pursley; Petter Risholm; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; William M Wells; Clare M Tempany; Robert A Cormack Journal: Med Phys Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 4.071