Literature DB >> 1884180

Warm and cold specific somatosensory systems. Psychophysical thresholds, reaction times and peripheral conduction velocities.

D Yarnitsky1, J L Ochoa.   

Abstract

Perception thresholds for warm and cold sensation were measured by two methods, the method of levels and the method of limits, at various rates of temperature change. The following findings were obtained. (1) The threshold value is critically dependent upon the method through which it is obtained, being higher for the method that includes reaction time in the measurement. (2) When using a method that includes participation of reaction time, threshold increases with increasing rate of temperature change. (3) The artefactual threshold elevation recorded through the method of limits corresponds precisely to the reaction time. (4) Conduction velocities for the primary afferents mediating the sensations of warm and cold, calculated on the basis of reaction time and conduction distance are in keeping with the mediation of warm sensation by unmyelinated primary afferents and of cold sensation by small myelinated afferents. (5) Measurement of threshold by the method of levels and direct measurement of reaction time enables calculation of conduction velocity for the specific sensory submodality tested from a single stimulation site.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1884180     DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.4.1819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  28 in total

1.  Slowly conducting afferents activated by innocuous low temperature in human skin.

Authors:  M Campero; J Serra; H Bostock; J L Ochoa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Quantitative thermal perception thresholds relative to exposure to vibration.

Authors:  T Nilsson; R Lundström
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Spatial resolution of the pain system: a proximal-to-distal gradient of sensitivity revealed with psychophysical testing.

Authors:  Irit Weissman-Fogel; Nurit Brayer-Zwi; Ruth Defrin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Characteristics of the local cutaneous sensory thermoneutral zone.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Hui Zhang; Edward A Arens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Quantitative sensory testing to evaluate and compare the results after epidural injection and simple discectomy, in patients with radiculopathy secondary to lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Irene Garcia-Saiz; Enrique M San Norberto; Eduardo Tamayo; Enrique Ortega; Cesar Aldecoa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Reliability of the method of levels for determining cutaneous temperature sensitivity.

Authors:  Miroljub Jakovljević; Igor B Mekjavić
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 7.  Neuropathic pain: is quantitative sensory testing helpful?

Authors:  Elena K Krumova; Christian Geber; Andrea Westermann; Christoph Maier
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans.

Authors:  Matthew Kostek; Anna Polaski; Benedict Kolber; Austin Ramsey; Alexander Kranjec; Kimberly Szucs
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Docetaxel-induced nail changes--a neurogenic mechanism: a case report.

Authors:  Gunnar Wasner; Felix Hilpert; Jörn Schattschneider; Andreas Binder; Jacobus Pfisterer; Ralf Baron
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  The fine tuning of pain thresholds: a sophisticated double alarm system.

Authors:  Léon Plaghki; Céline Decruynaere; Paul Van Dooren; Daniel Le Bars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.