Literature DB >> 18841438

Irish National Joint Registry: a concept.

K O Oduwole1, M B Codd, F Byrne, J O'Byrne, P J Kenny.   

Abstract

Despite the well-documented benefits, some countries have yet to agree on the establishment of a national joint register. A questionnaire study was undertaken to ascertain the opinions of the consultant orthopaedic surgeons and specialist registrars, regarding establishment of an Irish National Joint Register. The aim was to find out the possible reasons why a national joint register has not been established in Ireland. A 69% first response rate was recorded. Ninety-seven percent believe it is time to set up a registry and 81% say it should be made compulsory for unwilling surgeons and hospitals to participate. Despite the overwhelming support, privacy and liability issues were major concerns. Fifty-eight percent agree that access to registry report by general public can expose surgeons and hospitals to medico-legal implications. Legislation may be required to protect the integrity of a national joint replacement registry to ensure that the data are used as intended.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18841438     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-008-0222-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  8 in total

1.  The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project.

Authors:  O Robertsson; S Lewold; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-02

2.  National Joint Replacement Registries: has the time come?

Authors:  W J Maloney
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Shortcomings of the National Joint Registry: a survey of consultants' views.

Authors:  M R Philipson; M J Westwood; J M Geoghegan; A P J Henry; C D Jefferiss
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  C Kolling; B R Simmen; G Labek; J Goldhahn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-12

5.  Cost analysis of revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5-year followup study.

Authors:  R L Barrack; J Sawhney; J Hsu; R H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-04

7.  How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.

Authors:  P Herberts; H Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Presidential guest address: the Swedish Hip Registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data.

Authors:  Henrik Malchau; Göran Garellick; Thomas Eisler; Johan Kärrholm; Peter Herberts
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.176

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of a patient recall following early failure of hip hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  M Nugent; J G Galbraith; A P Fitzgerald; R Gul; N O Healy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  The Irish National Joint Registry: where are we now?

Authors:  B J O'Neill; M Nugent; J P Cashman; S J O'Flanagan; P Keogh; P J Kenny
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.568

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.