Literature DB >> 18057354

Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register.

C Kolling1, B R Simmen, G Labek, J Goldhahn.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of the first National Arthroplasty Register in Sweden in 1975, many other countries have tried to adopt the successful Scandinavian system. However, not all have overcome the political and practical difficulties of establishing a working register. We have surveyed the current registries to establish the key factors required for an effective database. We have received detailed information from 15 arthroplasty registers worldwide. The legal conditions under which they operate together with the methods of collection and handling of the data differ widely, but the fulfilment of certain criteria is necessary achieve a high degree of completeness of the data to ensure the provision of statistically relevant information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057354     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  19 in total

1.  Feasibility of establishing an Australian ACL registry: a pilot study by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR).

Authors:  Christina Lekkas; Richard Clarnette; Stephen E Graves; Sophia Rainbird; David Parker; Michelle Lorimer; Roger Paterson; Justin Roe; Hayden Morris; Julian A Feller; Peter Annear; Ben Forster; David Hayes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Irish National Joint Registry: a concept.

Authors:  K O Oduwole; M B Codd; F Byrne; J O'Byrne; P J Kenny
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  The variability of surgical practice during total knee arthroplasty: results of a national survey amongst Belgian knee surgeons.

Authors:  S Mufty; K Brabants; F Almqvist; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Joint replacement surgery in the Armed Forces Medical Services, India: The journey so far and looking ahead.

Authors:  B K Chopra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-01

Review 5.  Health policy implications of outcomes measurement in orthopaedics.

Authors:  John Philip Andrawis; Kate Eresian Chenok; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Temporal trends in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery: results from a UK regional joint register, 1991-2004.

Authors:  T Ibrahim; B Bloch; C N Esler; K R Abrams; W M Harper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  CORR Insights®: Can Bar Code Scanning Improve Data Capture in a National Register? Findings From the Irish National Orthopaedic Register.

Authors:  Kelly G Vince
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Christian Schröder; Andreas Fottner; Arnd Steinbrück; Oliver Betz; Peter E Müller; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Hölzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; K I E Snell; J Daniel; R B C Treacy; P B Pynsent; R D Riley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-06-14

10.  More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Liza N van Steenbergen; Geke A W Denissen; Anneke Spooren; Stephanie M van Rooden; Frank J van Oosterhout; Jan W Morrenhof; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.