Literature DB >> 15032988

Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?

Ines Jentzsch1, Hartmut Leuthold, K Richard Ridderinkhof.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms underlying movement preprogramming in situations where informative but ambiguous precue information is used. In a response precuing task that involved flexion or extension movements with the right or left index finger, a spatially compatible precue conveyed partial information about side, about direction, no parameter information (ambiguous condition), or no information at all. Advance movement preparation was indicated by reaction-time shortening for all informative precue conditions. The analysis of stimulus- and response-locked lateralized readiness potential onsets revealed a clear and exclusive motoric origin of the ambiguous-precue benefit. Additional analyses ruled out a strategic trial by trial choice of just one of the two ambiguous alternatives and provided evidence for a parallel preparation of both response alternatives when information only about direction or ambiguous precue information is provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15032988     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00155.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  On the equivalence of executed and imagined movements: evidence from lateralized motor and nonmotor potentials.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Simon Mathews; Phil J A Dean; Annette Sterr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Modification of planned actions.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Shannon Matkovich; Sam J Gilbert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Voluntarily-generated unimanual preparation is associated with stopping success: evidence from LRP and lateralized mu ERD before the stop signal.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Ko; Shih-Kuen Cheng; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-04-10

5.  Task complexity differentially affects executed and imagined movement preparation: evidence from movement-related potentials.

Authors:  Cornelia Kranczioch; Simon Mathews; Philip Dean; Annette Sterr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Active inference, attention, and motor preparation.

Authors:  Harriet Brown; Karl Friston; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-21

7.  Effector-independent reduction in choice reaction time following bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation over motor cortex.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Gabrielle Hayduk-Costa; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation.

Authors:  R Frömer; H Lin; C K Dean Wolf; M Inzlicht; A Shenhav
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Dissociating effector and movement direction selection during the preparation of manual reaching movements: evidence from lateralized ERP components.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; José Van Velzen; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Gearing up for action: attentive tracking dynamically tunes sensory and motor oscillations in the alpha and beta band.

Authors:  Heng-Ru May Tan; Hartmut Leuthold; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.