| Literature DB >> 18841157 |
Y Mizukami1, K Kono, T Maruyama, M Watanabe, Y Kawaguchi, K Kamimura, H Fujii.
Abstract
As antigenic peptides in the context of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecules are recognised by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), the downregulation of HLA class I molecules is one of the reasons why tumour cells can evade CTL-mediated anti-tumour immunity. In this study, we investigated HLA class I expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (n=70) and in their metastatic lesions (lymph nodes (n=40) and liver (n=3)), by immunohistochemistry with anti-HLA class I monoclonal antibody (EMR8-5). As a result, the downregulation of HLA class I expression in primary lesions of ESCC was observed in 43%, and that in metastatic lymph nodes was noted in 90%. Furthermore, patients with preserved HLA class I expression in primary tumours showed a better survival in comparison to those with downregulated HLA class I molecules (P<0.01). Furthermore, multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that the downregulated expression of HLA class I in primary lesions was an independent, unfavourable prognostic factor (P<0.01). In conclusion, the downregulation of HLA class I expression frequently occurred in primary tumour and, to a greater extent, in metastatic lesions of patients with ESCC and was associated with patient survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18841157 PMCID: PMC2579690 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient and tumour characteristics (n=70)
| Age (years, mean±s.d.) | 64.9±8.9 |
|
| |
| Male : female | 66 : 4 |
|
| |
| Mean (±s.d.) | 48.2±21.6 |
|
| |
| T1 | 28 |
| T2 | 5 |
| T3 | 34 |
| T4 | 3 |
|
| |
| N0 | 30 |
| N1 | 40 |
|
| |
| Well | 15 |
| Moderately | 38 |
| Poorly | 17 |
|
| |
| I | 14 |
| IIA | 16 |
| IIB | 16 |
| III | 24 |
| IV | 0 |
Abbreviations: Moderately=moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; poorly=poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; well=well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
Tumour, lymph node metastasis, and stage according to the TNM classification for oesophageal cancer (UICC).
Figure 1Representative immunohistochemical staining of MHC class I molecules in primary lesions of ESCC patients. The intensity of HLA class I staining was evaluated using the following criteria: strong expression, dark brown staining in more than 50% of tumour cells completely obscuring the cytoplasm (A); weak expression, any lesser degree of brown staining appreciable in tumour cells (B); absent expression, no appreciable staining in tumour cells (C). Positive control for HLA class I expression involving normal oesophageal mucosa (D).
HLA class I expression of tumours in relation to clinicopathologic status
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| I ( | 12 | 1 | 1 | |
| IIA ( | 7 | 8 | 1 | ** |
| IIB ( | 11 | 2 | 3 | |
| III ( | 10 | 13 | 1 | |
|
| ||||
| T1 ( | 22 | 3 | 3 | |
| T2 ( | 1 | 3 | 1 | ** |
| T3 ( | 15 | 17 | 2 | |
| T4 ( | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
|
| ||||
| N0 ( | 19 | 9 | 2 | |
| N1 ( | 21 | 15 | 4 | NS |
|
| ||||
| Well ( | 7 | 8 | 0 | |
| Moderately ( | 27 | 10 | 1 | ** |
| Poorly ( | 6 | 6 | 5 | |
Abbreviations: Moderately=moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; NS=not significant; poorly=poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; Well=well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
**P<0.05 by the χ2 test.
Tumour, lymph node metastasis, and stage according to the TNM classification for esophageal cancer (UICC).
Figure 2Representative immunohistochemical staining of MHC class I molecules in metastatic lymph nodes (B) and the liver (D) of ESCC patients. Serial sections for haematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining are shown in (A) and (C).
(A) Correlation of HLA class I expression between primary lesion and lymph node metastasis (n=40); (B) Correlation of HLA class I expression between primary lesion and liver metastasis (n=3)
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strong ( | 4 | 15 | 2 |
| Weak ( | 0 | 10 | 5 |
| Absent ( | 0 | 0 | 4 |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
| Strong ( | 1 | 1 | |
| Weak ( | 0 | 1 | |
| Absent ( | 0 | 0 | |
Abbreviations: Absent=absent expression; strong=strong expression; weak=weak expression.
Figure 3Survival curves in ESCC patients. Kaplan–Meier analyses of the survival of patients with ESCC according to variables are demonstrated as T factors (A), lymph node metastasis (B), stage (C), and HLA class I expression in primary lesions (D), respectively (n=70, P-values by the log-rank test). (D) HLA class I expression in primary lesions was classified into strong (n=40), weak (n=24), or absent (n=6). (A) The median survival time in pT1 was significantly longer than that in pT3, but there were not significant differences in any other combination. (B) The median survival time in pN0 was significantly longer than that in pN1. (C) The median survival time in Stage I was significantly longer than that in Stage II B, but there were not significant differences in any other combination. (D) The median survival time in strong expression was significantly longer than that in weak expression in terms of HLA class I expression.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of patients
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (years) | <65 ( | 1.76 (0.85–3.62) | 0.13 | ||
| Gender | Male ( | 1.80 (0.25–13.21) | 0.56 | ||
| Tumour size (mm) | ⩾45 ( | 2.51 (1.20–5.26) | 0.014** | 1.81 (0.72–4.54) | 0.21 |
| Tumour | T3+T4 ( | 2.73 (1.25–5.95) | 0.012** | 1.18 (0.44–3.14) | 0.74 |
| Lymph node metastasis | N1 ( | 4.48 (1.91–10.55) | <0.01** | 2.86 (0.82–10.03) | 0.10 |
| Stage | Stage II+III ( | 6.55 (1.55–27.73) | 0.011** | 1.31 (0.22–7.83) | 0.77 |
| HLA class I expression | Weak+absent ( | 4.03 (1.87–8.70) | <0.01** | 3.42 (1.40–8.33) | <0.01** |
| Lymphatic invasion | Positive ( | 3.18 (1.34–7.52) | <0.01** | 1.03 (0.32–3.34) | 0.96 |
| Vascular invasion | Positive ( | 2.74 (1.31–5.75) | <0.01** | 1.48 (0.58–3.80) | 0.42 |
| Histological classification | Poorly ( | 1.67 (0.78–3.57) | 0.18 | ||
Abbreviations: HR=hazard ratio; 95% CI=95% confidence interval; moderately=moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; poorly=poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; well=well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
**P<0.05.
Tumour, lymph node metastasis, and stage according to the TNM classification for oesophageal cancer (UICC).