Literature DB >> 1884110

Modulation of the structure-binding relationships of antagonists for muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes.

E K Pedder1, P Eveleigh, D Poyner, E C Hulme, N J Birdsall.   

Abstract

1. Membranes from rat cerebral cortex, myocardium and extraorbital lacrimal gland were used as sources of M1, M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors respectively and the affinities of seven antagonists for the three subtypes were examined under different experimental conditions. 2. The affinities for the membrane-bound receptors were measured at different ionic strengths and temperatures and compared with those determined on the receptor solubilised in the neutral detergent digitonin or the zwitterionic detergent, CHAPSO. 3. The range of measured affinity constants of a given antagonist for a specific subtype varied from 2 (atropine at M1 receptors) to 1000 (AF-DX 116 at M2 receptors). 4. As a consequence of these changes in affinity, which were dependent on the drug, the subtype and the experimental conditions, both the structure-binding relationships of a given subtype can be markedly changed as well as the selectivity of a drug for the different subtypes. For example it is possible to change the relative affinities of AF-DX 116 and gallamine at membrane-bound M1 receptors from 50:1 to 1:60. 5. Experimental conditions for the observation of high selectivity of pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, gallamine and hexahydrosiladiphenidol for the three subtypes are given. 6. When the receptors are removed from their membrane environment by solubilisation in detergent, antagonist affinities are changed but the subtypes still retain different structure-binding relationships. 7. In general, AF-DX 116 and the allosteric antagonist, gallamine, behave differently from the other antagonists, suggesting that they bind in different ways to muscarinic receptors. Careful attention should therefore be paid to the experimental conditions in binding assays used to assess the affinities and selectivities of new muscarinic antagonists in order to avoid misleading results. 9. The ability to produce enhanced or attenuated affinities and selectivities of antagonists, resulting from the induction of different conformations of the receptor by a variety of physical, chemical or molecular biological perturbations may lead to a better understanding of the structural basis of drug receptor interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1884110      PMCID: PMC1908365          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1991.tb09827.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  22 in total

1.  Propylbenzilylcholine mustard labels an acidic residue in transmembrane helix 3 of the muscarinic receptor.

Authors:  C A Curtis; M Wheatley; S Bansal; N J Birdsall; P Eveleigh; E K Pedder; D Poyner; E C Hulme
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Authors:  E C Hulme; N J Birdsall; N J Buckley
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 3.  The modes of binding of ligands to cardiac muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  N J Birdsall; S C Chan; P Eveleigh; E C Hulme; K W Miller
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  Allosteric interactions of three muscarine antagonists at bovine tracheal smooth muscle and cardiac M2 receptors.

Authors:  A F Roffel; C R Elzinga; H Meurs; J Zaagsma
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-03-07       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Soluble and membrane-bound muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  N J Birdsall; E C Hulme; M Keen; E K Pedder; D Poyner; J M Stockton; M Wheatley
Journal:  Biochem Soc Symp       Date:  1986

6.  Two populations of binding sites for muscarinic antagonists in the rat heart.

Authors:  E C Hulme; C P Berrie; N J Birdsall; A S Burgen
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1981-07-17       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  The effects of ions on the binding of agonists and antagonists to muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  N J Birdsall; A S Burgen; E C Hulme; J W Wells
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Peptide sequencing identifies residues involved in antagonist binding and disulfide bond formation.

Authors:  E Kurtenbach; C A Curtis; E K Pedder; A Aitken; A C Harris; E C Hulme
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Regulation of muscarinic agonist binding by cations and guanine nucleotides.

Authors:  E C Hulme; C P Berrie; N J Birdsall; M Jameson; J M Stockton
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  Solubilization and characterization of guanine nucleotide-sensitive muscarinic agonist binding sites from rat myocardium.

Authors:  C P Berrie; N J Birdsall; E C Hulme; M Keen; J M Stockton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  11 in total

1.  Characterization of pre- and postsynaptic muscarinic receptors in circular muscle of pig gastric fundus.

Authors:  Pascal G Leclere; Romain A Lefebvre
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Muscarinic receptors in isolated urinary bladder smooth muscle from different mouse strains.

Authors:  A Choppin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Pharmacological evidence for putative CCK(1) receptor heterogeneity in human colon smooth muscle.

Authors:  M F Morton; E A Harper; I A Tavares; N P Shankley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Subtype-selective inhibition of [methyl-3H]-N-methylscopolamine binding to muscarinic receptors by alpha-truxillic acid esters.

Authors:  M Lysíková; K Fuksová; T Elbert; J Jakubík; S Tucek
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation.

Authors:  Edward C Hulme; Mike A Trevethick
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  A muscarinic receptor different from the M1, M2, M3 and M4 subtypes mediates the contraction of the rabbit iris sphincter.

Authors:  I T Bognar; U Altes; C Beinhauer; I Kessler; H Fuder
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Role of M1 muscarinic receptors in the parasympathetic control of colonic motility in cats and rabbits.

Authors:  F Blanquet; J Gonella
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Binding characteristics and functional G protein coupling of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in rat duodenum smooth muscle membranes.

Authors:  C Liebmann; S Nawrath; M Schnittler; H Schubert; K H Jakobs
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Modulation of antagonist binding to histamine H1-receptors by sodium ions and by 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propan-1,3-diol HCl.

Authors:  W J Gibson; T W Roques; J M Young
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Loss of [3H]4-DAMP binding to muscarinic receptors in the orbitofrontal cortex of Alzheimer's disease patients with psychosis.

Authors:  S W Y Tsang; P T Francis; M M Esiri; P T H Wong; C P L H Chen; M K P Lai
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-03-30       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.