Literature DB >> 18841081

Pretesting static and dynamic stretching does not affect maximal strength.

Barry Beedle1, Scott J Rytter, Ryan C Healy, Tara R Ward.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a significant difference in static stretching (SS), dynamic stretching (DS), and no stretching (NS) on maximal strength (one-repetition maximum [1RM]) in the bench and leg presses using free weights on 19 college-aged men and 32 women. Most of the participants were moderately to very active and had previous experience with weight training. The design was repeated measures, with each treatment being randomly assigned. Each testing session was separated by 72 hours. Moderate-intensity stretching was defined as stretching as far as possible without any assistance, and subjects were encouraged to do their best. For the SS routine, the chest, shoulder, triceps, quadriceps, and hamstrings were stretched. Three repetitions were performed for 15 seconds, each separated by a 10-second rest. For DS, the upper-body stretch was swinging each arm, one at a time, as far forward and then as far backward as possible in a diagonal plane. For the legs, the same movement was done for each leg, except performed in a sagittal plane. Each forward and backward movement took about 2 seconds. Three 30-second sets were administered, and a 10-second rest was allowed between sets. Next, 1RM was determined for the bench and leg presses in random order. Two warm-up sets were given, followed by several 1RM attempts. The last successful lift was recorded as the 1RM. Data were reported using means +/- SD. A one-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used with alpha set at 0.05. There was no significant difference among the treatments. Moderate-intensity stretching does not seem to adversely affect 1RM in the bench and leg presses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18841081     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181821bc9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  Short Durations of Static Stretching when Combined with Dynamic Stretching do not Impair Repeated Sprints and Agility.

Authors:  Del P Wong; Anis Chaouachi; Patrick W C Lau; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Acute Effects of Dynamic Stretching on Muscle Flexibility and Performance: An Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Jules Opplert; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Acute effects of two different warm-up protocols on flexibility and lower limb explosive performance in male and female high level athletes.

Authors:  Charilaos Tsolakis; Gregory C Bogdanis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Acute effects of different stretching techniques on the number of repetitions in a single lower body resistance training session.

Authors:  Marcos A Sá; Gabriel R Neto; Pablo B Costa; Thiago M Gomes; Cláudio M Bentes; Amanda F Brown; Jefferson S Novaes
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Effects of Static Stretching on Squat Performance in Division I Female Athletes.

Authors:  Clare F Heisey; J Derek Kingsley
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

7.  Effects of Different Doses of Caffeinated Coffee on Muscular Endurance, Cognitive Performance, and Cardiac Autonomic Modulation in Caffeine Naive Female Athletes.

Authors:  Raci Karayigit; Alireza Naderi; Firat Akca; Carlos Janssen Gomes da Cruz; Amir Sarshin; Burak Caglar Yasli; Gulfem Ersoz; Mojtaba Kaviani
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.