OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of liver transplantation after paracetamol overdose. DESIGN: Prospective study of consecutive candidates for transplantation and performance of transplantation over 18 months. SETTING: Liver unit, King's College Hospital, London. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fulfilment of indicators of poor prognosis, selection for transplantation, transplantation, survival. RESULTS: 30 of 37 patients considered to have a reasonable prognosis with intensive medical care survived. Of 14 of 29 patients considered to have a very poor prognosis and registered for urgent liver transplantation, six received liver transplants, four of whom survived, while seven died and one survived without a transplant. Three of 15 patients with poor prognostic indicators but not selected for transplantation survived. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation will have a definite but limited role in the management of fulminant hepatic failure induced by paracetamol.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of liver transplantation after paracetamoloverdose. DESIGN: Prospective study of consecutive candidates for transplantation and performance of transplantation over 18 months. SETTING: Liver unit, King's College Hospital, London. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fulfilment of indicators of poor prognosis, selection for transplantation, transplantation, survival. RESULTS: 30 of 37 patients considered to have a reasonable prognosis with intensive medical care survived. Of 14 of 29 patients considered to have a very poor prognosis and registered for urgent liver transplantation, six received liver transplants, four of whom survived, while seven died and one survived without a transplant. Three of 15 patients with poor prognostic indicators but not selected for transplantation survived. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation will have a definite but limited role in the management of fulminant hepatic failure induced by paracetamol.
Authors: S Iwatsuki; A C Stieber; J W Marsh; A G Tzakis; S Todo; B Koneru; L Makowka; R D Gordon; T E Starzl Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1989-02 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: D Gunnell; K Hawton; V Murray; R Garnier; C Bismuth; J Fagg; S Simkin Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 3.710