Literature DB >> 18840549

Brca2/Xrcc2 dependent HR, but not NHEJ, is required for protection against O(6)-methylguanine triggered apoptosis, DSBs and chromosomal aberrations by a process leading to SCEs.

Wynand P Roos1, Teodora Nikolova, Steve Quiros, Steffen C Naumann, Olivia Kiedron, Małgorzata Z Zdzienicka, Bernd Kaina.   

Abstract

O(6)-methylguanine (O(6)MeG) is a highly critical DNA adduct induced by methylating carcinogens and anticancer drugs such as temozolomide, streptozotocine, procarbazine and dacarbazine. Induction of cell death by O(6)MeG lesions requires mismatch repair (MMR) and cell proliferation and is thought to be dependent on the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) or, according to an alternative hypothesis, direct signaling by the MMR complex. Given a role for DSBs in this process, either homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or both might protect against O(6)MeG. Here, we compared the response of cells mutated in HR and NHEJ proteins to temozolomide and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). The data show that cells defective in HR (Xrcc2 and Brca2 mutants) are extremely sensitive to cell death by apoptosis and chromosomal aberration formation and less sensitive to sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) induction than the corresponding wild-type. Cells defective in NHEJ were not (Ku80 mutant), or only slightly more sensitive (DNA-PK(cs) mutant) to cell death and showed similar aberration and SCE frequencies than the corresponding wild-type. Transfection of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in all of the mutants almost completely abrogated the genotoxic effects in both HR and NHEJ defective cells, indicating the mutant-specific hypersensitivity was due to O(6)MeG lesions. MNNG provoked H2AX phosphorylation 24-48h after methylation both in wild-type and HR mutants, which was not found in MGMT transfected cells. The gammaH2AX foci formed in response to O(6)MeG declined later in wild-type but not in HR-defective cells. The data support a model where DSBs are formed in response to O(6)MeG in the post-treatment cell cycle, which are repaired by HR, but not NHEJ, in a process that leads to SCEs. Therefore, HR can be considered as a mechanism that causes tolerance of O(6)MeG adducts. The data implicate that down-regulation or inhibition of HR might be a powerful strategy in improving cancer therapy with methylating agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18840549     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  42 in total

1.  PTEN loss compromises homologous recombination repair in astrocytes: implications for glioblastoma therapy with temozolomide or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.

Authors:  Brian McEllin; Cristel V Camacho; Bipasha Mukherjee; Brandon Hahm; Nozomi Tomimatsu; Robert M Bachoo; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Cell cycle-dependent regulation of the bi-directional overlapping promoter of human BRCA2/ZAR2 genes in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Smita Misra; Shvetank Sharma; Anupriya Agarwal; Sheetal V Khedkar; Manish K Tripathi; Mukul K Mittal; Gautam Chaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 27.401

3.  The homologous recombination protein RAD51D mediates the processing of 6-thioguanine lesions downstream of mismatch repair.

Authors:  Preeti Rajesh; Alexandra V Litvinchuk; Douglas L Pittman; Michael D Wyatt
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  O6-Methylguanine DNA lesions induce an intra-S-phase arrest from which cells exit into apoptosis governed by early and late multi-pathway signaling network activation.

Authors:  Ericka M Noonan; Dharini Shah; Michael B Yaffe; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Leona D Samson
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Downregulation of IGF1R Expression Inhibits Growth and Enhances Cisplatin Sensitivity of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Ashraf Khalil; Mark J Jameson
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  MGMT gene promoter methylation correlates with tolerance of temozolomide treatment in melanoma but not with clinical outcome.

Authors:  J C Hassel; A Sucker; L Edler; H Kurzen; I Moll; C Stresemann; K Spieth; C Mauch; K Rass; R Dummer; D Schadendorf
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Retinoblastoma Binding Protein 4 Modulates Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma by Regulating DNA Repair Proteins.

Authors:  Gaspar J Kitange; Ann C Mladek; Mark A Schroeder; Jenny C Pokorny; Brett L Carlson; Yuji Zhang; Asha A Nair; Jeong-Heon Lee; Huihuang Yan; Paul A Decker; Zhiguo Zhang; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  DNA ligase IV as a new molecular target for temozolomide.

Authors:  Natsuko Kondo; Akihisa Takahashi; Eiichiro Mori; Ken Ohnishi; Peter J McKinnon; Toshisuke Sakaki; Hiroyuki Nakase; Takeo Ohnishi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Mutant IDH1-driven cellular transformation increases RAD51-mediated homologous recombination and temozolomide resistance.

Authors:  Shigeo Ohba; Joydeep Mukherjee; Wendy L See; Russell O Pieper
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Temozolomide- and fotemustine-induced apoptosis in human malignant melanoma cells: response related to MGMT, MMR, DSBs, and p53.

Authors:  S C Naumann; W P Roos; E Jöst; C Belohlavek; V Lennerz; C W Schmidt; M Christmann; B Kaina
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.