Literature DB >> 18836151

Combining matched and unmatched control groups in case-control studies.

Saskia le Cessie1, Nico Nagelkerke, Frits R Rosendaal, Karlijn J van Stralen, Elisabeth R Pomp, Hans C van Houwelingen.   

Abstract

Multiple control groups in case-control studies are used to control for different sources of confounding. For example, cases can be contrasted with matched controls to adjust for multiple genetic or unknown lifestyle factors and simultaneously contrasted with an unmatched population-based control group. Inclusion of different control groups for a single exposure analysis yields several estimates of the odds ratio, all using only part of the data. Here the authors introduce an easy way to combine odds ratios from several case-control analyses with the same cases. The approach is based upon methods used for meta-analysis but takes into account the fact that the same cases are used and that the estimated odds ratios are therefore correlated. Two ways of estimating this correlation are discussed: sandwich methodology and the bootstrap. Confidence intervals for the pooled estimates and a test for checking whether the odds ratios in the separate case-control studies differ significantly are derived. The performance of the method is studied by simulation and by applying the methods to a large study on risk factors for thrombosis, the MEGA Study (1999-2004), wherein cases with first venous thrombosis were included with a matched control group of partners and an unmatched population-based control group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18836151     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  6 in total

1.  Two-Phase, Generalized Case-Control Designs for the Study of Quantitative Longitudinal Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Sebastien Haneuse; Ran Tao; Leila R Zelnick; Enrique F Schisterman; Shawn P Garbett; Nathaniel D Mercaldo; Paul J Rathouz; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A hybrid method in combining treatment effects from matched and unmatched studies.

Authors:  Jinyoung Byun; Dejian Lai; Sheng Luo; Jan Risser; Betty Tung; Robert J Hardy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A simple and robust method for partially matched samples using the p-values pooling approach.

Authors:  Pei Fen Kuan; Bo Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A polytomous conditional likelihood approach for combining matched and unmatched case-control studies.

Authors:  Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Paulo Guimaraes; Wendy Cozen; David V Conti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Experience with multiple control groups in a large population-based case-control study on genetic and environmental risk factors.

Authors:  E R Pomp; K J Van Stralen; S Le Cessie; J P Vandenbroucke; F R Rosendaal; C J M Doggen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Screening for cognitive impairment among patients with work-related stress complaints in Denmark: validation and evaluation of objective and self-report tools.

Authors:  Johan Høy Jensen; Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak; Scot E Purdon; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Nanna Hurwitz Eller
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.024

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.