Literature DB >> 18836127

The use of evidence-based clinical tools in occupational medicine.

Kevin Bailey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known of UK occupational physicians' usage of screening questionnaires in assessment. AIM: To determine, among members of the Society of Occupational Medicine (SOM), the degree of awareness and the extent of usage of 12 previously validated screening questionnaires and two educational interventions.
METHOD: A cross-sectional self-report survey of a random sample of 400 members of the SOM.
RESULTS: The response rate was 54% (216). Awareness was good especially for the disease-specific questionnaires. However, no usage (0%) exceeded low usage (1-50%) for half the survey instruments. For three instruments, the converse applied and for four instruments no usage equalled low usage. The main reasons for non-usage were lack of availability and lack of time.
CONCLUSIONS: The most used and familiar instruments were the Back Book, Mini-Mental State Examination and Numerical Rating Scale. Over half the respondents also used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test and the remaining pain scales at least to some degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18836127     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqn128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  2 in total

1.  [Anxiety and Depression Associated with the Management of COVID-19 Among Healthcare workers in Cameroon].

Authors:  Célestin Pierre Mboua; François Roger Nguépy Keubo; Sylvain Gautier Ngueuteu Fouaka
Journal:  Evol Psychiatr (Paris)       Date:  2020-12-09

2.  Occupational health professionals' knowledge, understanding and use of work ability.

Authors:  K Coomer; J Houdmont
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.611

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.