Literature DB >> 18834734

Impact of an antimicrobial-impregnated gauze dressing on surgical site infections including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Shawn Westadt Mueller1, Larry E Krebsbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common complication of surgery. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a particularly troublesome infectious agent in this setting. SSIs contribute to increased morbidity and mortality, as well as increasing length of hospital stay and costs.
METHODS: Sterile plain gauze dressings were replaced institution-wide by a comparable sterile antimicrobial gauze dressing (AMD) impregnated with 0.2% polyhexamethylene biguaide. SSIs, and specifically MRSA-SSIs, were tracked for the 11-month periods before and after the dressing switch, using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.
RESULTS: Before the introduction of AMD, 101 SSIs occurred after 9372 surgical procedures (1.08%), 20 of which were identified as MRSA (0.21%). After introduction of AMD, 84 SSIs occurred after 10,202 surgical procedures (0.82%), representing a rate reduction of 24.07% (P = .035), with 11 identified as MRSA (0.11%), representing a reduction of 47.62% (P = .047). This reduction in SSIs represents an annual cost savings to the institution of $508,605.
CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in SSIs, and specifically MRSA-SSIs, resulted from a simple change from plain sterile gauze to a sterile comparable antimicrobial dressing. This change reduced morbidity and possibly mortality after surgery, shortened hospital stays, and reduced the costs of postsurgical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18834734     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Economic features of antibiotic resistance: the case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Fernando Antonanzas; Carmen Lozano; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.

Authors:  C Lipp; K Kirker; A Agostinho; G James; P Stewart
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 4.  Antibiotics-Free Compounds for Chronic Wound Healing.

Authors:  David O Oluwole; Lucy Coleman; William Buchanan; Tao Chen; Roberto M La Ragione; Lian X Liu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Use of bacteria- and fungus-binding mesh in negative pressure wound therapy provides significant granulation tissue without tissue ingrowth.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Sandra Lindstedt; Richard Ingemansson; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-01-17

Review 6.  Evaluating polymeric biomaterials to improve next generation wound dressing design.

Authors:  Jacob G Hodge; David S Zamierowski; Jennifer L Robinson; Adam J Mellott
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2022-10-01

7.  Beyond wet-to-dry: a rational approach to treating chronic wounds.

Authors:  Johnson C Lee; Swetha Kandula; Noëlle S Sherber
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-04-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.