OBJECTIVE: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performed a detailed analysis of p53 overexpression in previously-untreated women with invasive early or advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS:Women were eligible for the study if they provided a tumor block for translational research and participated in either GOG-157, a randomized phase III trial of three versus (vs.) six cycles of paclitaxel+carboplatin in high-risk, early stage EOC, or GOG-111, a randomized phase III trial of cyclophosphamide+cisplatin vs. paclitaxel+cisplatin in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage EOC. The N-terminal DO-7 p53 antibody was used to examine the expression of the major normal and mutant p53-isoforms. p53 overexpression was defined as >or=10% tumor cells exhibiting nuclear staining. RESULTS: p53 was overexpressed in 51% (73/143) and 66% (90/136) of cases in the GOG-157 and GOG-111 cohorts, respectively. In the GOG-157 cohort, p53 overexpression was not associated with any clinical characteristics or overall survival (OS) but was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) (logrank test: p=0.013; unadjusted Cox modeling: p=0.015). In the GOG-111 cohort, p53 overexpression was associated with GOG performance status (p=0.018) and grade (p=0.003), but not with age, stage, cell type or with tumor response and disease status after primary chemotherapy, PFS or OS. Adjusted Cox regression modeling demonstrated that p53 overexpression was not an independent prognostic factor for PFS or OS in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS:p53 overexpression assessed by DO-7 immunostaining is common in early and advanced stage EOC, but has limited prognostic value in women treated with surgical staging and platinum-based combination chemotherapy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performed a detailed analysis of p53 overexpression in previously-untreated women with invasive early or advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS:Women were eligible for the study if they provided a tumor block for translational research and participated in either GOG-157, a randomized phase III trial of three versus (vs.) six cycles of paclitaxel+carboplatin in high-risk, early stage EOC, or GOG-111, a randomized phase III trial of cyclophosphamide+cisplatin vs. paclitaxel+cisplatin in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage EOC. The N-terminal DO-7 p53 antibody was used to examine the expression of the major normal and mutant p53-isoforms. p53 overexpression was defined as >or=10% tumor cells exhibiting nuclear staining. RESULTS:p53 was overexpressed in 51% (73/143) and 66% (90/136) of cases in the GOG-157 and GOG-111 cohorts, respectively. In the GOG-157 cohort, p53 overexpression was not associated with any clinical characteristics or overall survival (OS) but was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) (logrank test: p=0.013; unadjusted Cox modeling: p=0.015). In the GOG-111 cohort, p53 overexpression was associated with GOG performance status (p=0.018) and grade (p=0.003), but not with age, stage, cell type or with tumor response and disease status after primary chemotherapy, PFS or OS. Adjusted Cox regression modeling demonstrated that p53 overexpression was not an independent prognostic factor for PFS or OS in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS:p53 overexpression assessed by DO-7 immunostaining is common in early and advanced stage EOC, but has limited prognostic value in women treated with surgical staging and platinum-based combination chemotherapy.
Authors: C Lavarino; S Pilotti; M Oggionni; L Gatti; P Perego; G Bresciani; M A Pierotti; G Scambia; G Ferrandina; A Fagotti; C Mangioni; V Lucchini; F Vecchione; G Bolis; G Scarfone; F Zunino Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R E Howells; T Holland; K K Dhar; C W Redman; P Hand; P R Hoban; P W Jones; A A Fryer; R C Strange Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: A Gadducci; C Cianci; S Cosio; F Carnino; A Fanucchi; F Buttitta; P F Conte; A R Genazzani Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: A Reles; W H Wen; A Schmider; C Gee; I B Runnebaum; U Kilian; L A Jones; A El-Naggar; C Minguillon; I Schönborn; O Reich; R Kreienberg; W Lichtenegger; M F Press Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ernest S Han; Robert A Burger; Kathleen M Darcy; Michael W Sill; Leslie M Randall; Dana Chase; Basmina Parmakhtiar; Bradley J Monk; Benjamin E Greer; Patrick Connelly; Koen Degeest; John P Fruehauf Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-09-25 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kwong-Kwok Wong; Daisy I Izaguirre; Suet-Yan Kwan; Erin R King; Michael T Deavers; Anil K Sood; Samuel C Mok; David M Gershenson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-06-22 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Haizhi Huang; Allen Y Chen; Yon Rojanasakul; Xingqian Ye; Gary O Rankin; Yi Charlie Chen Journal: J Funct Foods Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 4.451
Authors: John Farley; Sartoru Fuchiuji; Kathleen M Darcy; Chunqiao Tian; William J Hoskins; William P McGuire; Parviz Hanjani; David Warshal; Benjamin E Greer; Jerome Belinson; Michael J Birrer Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: David L Masica; Shuli Li; Christopher Douville; Judith Manola; Robert L Ferris; Barbara Burtness; Arlene A Forastiere; Wayne M Koch; Christine H Chung; Rachel Karchin Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2014-08-10 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: P de Graeff; A P G Crijns; S de Jong; M Boezen; W J Post; E G E de Vries; A G J van der Zee; G H de Bock Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 7.640