PURPOSE: The p53 tumor suppressor gene plays a central role in cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis. We analyzed p53 alterations and their impact on response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome in ovarian cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred seventy-eight ovarian carcinomas, snap frozen and stored at -80 degrees C, were analyzed for mutations of the p53 gene (exons 2-11) by single-strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing and for p53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (monoclonal antibody DO7). RESULTS: p53 mutations were found in 56% (99 of 178) of the tumors, and 62% of these were located in evolutionary highly conserved domains of the gene. Time to progression and overall survival were significantly shortened in patients with p53 mutations compared with wild-type p53 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.014) and patients with mutations in highly conserved domains as opposed to nonconserved domains or wild-type p53 (P = 0.010 and P = 0.007). p53 protein overexpression (>10% positively stained nuclei) was found in 62% (110 of 178). Time to progression and overall survival were shorter in cases with p53 overexpression (cutpoint, 10%: P = 0.071 and P = 0.056) but only marginally significant. Resistance to adjuvant cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy was significantly more frequent in patients with p53 overexpression (P = 0.001) or p53 missense mutations (P = 0.008) than patients with normal p53. CONCLUSIONS: p53 alterations correlate significantly with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, early relapse, and shortened overall survival in ovarian cancer patients in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis though, p53 was not an independent prognostic factor.
PURPOSE: The p53tumor suppressor gene plays a central role in cell cycle regulation and induction of apoptosis. We analyzed p53 alterations and their impact on response to chemotherapy and clinical outcome in ovarian cancerpatients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: One hundred seventy-eight ovarian carcinomas, snap frozen and stored at -80 degrees C, were analyzed for mutations of the p53 gene (exons 2-11) by single-strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing and for p53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (monoclonal antibody DO7). RESULTS:p53 mutations were found in 56% (99 of 178) of the tumors, and 62% of these were located in evolutionary highly conserved domains of the gene. Time to progression and overall survival were significantly shortened in patients with p53 mutations compared with wild-type p53 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.014) and patients with mutations in highly conserved domains as opposed to nonconserved domains or wild-type p53 (P = 0.010 and P = 0.007). p53 protein overexpression (>10% positively stained nuclei) was found in 62% (110 of 178). Time to progression and overall survival were shorter in cases with p53 overexpression (cutpoint, 10%: P = 0.071 and P = 0.056) but only marginally significant. Resistance to adjuvant cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy was significantly more frequent in patients with p53 overexpression (P = 0.001) or p53 missense mutations (P = 0.008) than patients with normal p53. CONCLUSIONS:p53 alterations correlate significantly with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, early relapse, and shortened overall survival in ovarian cancerpatients in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis though, p53 was not an independent prognostic factor.
Authors: Annette Schmider-Ross; Olaf Pirsig; Elisabeth Gottschalk; Carsten Denkert; Werner Lichtenegger; Angela Reles Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Spyridon P Basourakos; Likun Li; Ana M Aparicio; Paul G Corn; Jeri Kim; Timothy C Thompson Journal: Curr Med Chem Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Sham S Kakar; Christopher A Worth; Zhenglong Wang; Kelsey Carter; Mariusz Ratajczak; Pranesh Gunjal Journal: J Cancer Stem Cell Res Date: 2016-04-19
Authors: Marcus Q Bernardini; Tsukasa Baba; Paula S Lee; Jason C Barnett; Gregory P Sfakianos; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Susan K Murphy; Edwin Iversen; Jeffrey R Marks; Andrew Berchuck Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: P de Graeff; A P G Crijns; S de Jong; M Boezen; W J Post; E G E de Vries; A G J van der Zee; G H de Bock Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 7.640