Literature DB >> 18831640

Some observations on contrast detection in noise.

Robbe L T Goris1, Peter Zaenen, Johan Wagemans.   

Abstract

The standard psychophysical model of our early visual system consists of a linear filter stage, followed by a nonlinearity and an internal noise source. If a rectification mechanism is introduced at the output of the linear filter stage, as has been suggested on some occasions, this model actually predicts that human performance in a classical contrast detection task might benefit from the addition of weak levels of noise. Here, this prediction was tested and confirmed in two contrast detection tasks. In Experiment 1, observers had to discriminate a low-contrast Gabor pattern from a blank. In Experiment 2, observers had to discriminate two low-contrast Gabor patterns identical on all dimensions, except for orientation (-45 degrees vs. +45 degrees). In both experiments, weak-to-modest levels of 2-D, white noise were added to the stimuli. Detection thresholds vary nonmonotonically with noise power, i.e., some noise levels improve contrast detection performance. Both simple uncertainty reduction and an energy discrimination strategy can be excluded as possible explanations for this effect. We present a quantitative model consistent with the effects and discuss the implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18831640     DOI: 10.1167/8.9.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  6 in total

1.  The absolute threshold of cone vision.

Authors:  Darren Koenig; Heidi Hofer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  The benefits of noise in neural systems: bridging theory and experiment.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection.

Authors:  Lynn Schmittwilken; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Stochastic model for detection of signals in noise.

Authors:  Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Broadband noise masks suppress neural responses to narrowband stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Greta Vilidaitė
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.