Literature DB >> 18831164

Consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of predators on metacommunities of competing prey.

John L Orrock1, Jonathan H Grabowski, Jelena H Pantel, Scott D Peacor, Barbara L Peckarsky, Andrew Sih, Earl E Werner.   

Abstract

Although predators affect prey both via consumption and by changing prey migration behavior, the interplay between these two effects is rarely incorporated into spatial models of predator-prey dynamics and competition among prey. We develop a model where generalist predators have consumptive effects (i.e., altering the likelihood of local prey extinction) as well as nonconsumptive effects (altering the likelihood of colonization) on spatially separated prey populations (metapopulations). We then extend this model to explore the effects of predators on competition among prey. We find that generalist predators can promote persistence of prey metapopulations by promoting prey colonization, but predators can also hasten system-wide extinction by either increasing local extinction or reducing prey migration. By altering rates of prey migration, predators in one location can exert remote control over prey dynamics in another location via predator-mediated changes in prey flux. Thus, the effect of predators may extend well beyond the proportion of patches they visit. In the context of prey metacommunities, predator-mediated shifts in prey migration and mortality can shift the competition-colonization trade-off among competing prey, leading to changes in the prey community as well as changes in the susceptibility of prey species to habitat loss. Consequently, native prey communities may be susceptible to invasion not only by exotic prey species that experience reduced amounts of mortality from resident predators, but also by exotic prey species that exhibit strong dispersal in response to generalist native predators. Ultimately, our work suggests that the consumptive and nonconsumptive effects of generalist predators may have strong, yet potentially cryptic, effects on competing prey capable of mediating coexistence, fostering invasion, and interacting with anthropogenic habitat alteration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18831164     DOI: 10.1890/07-1024.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

1.  Local community size mediates ecological drift and competition in metacommunities.

Authors:  John L Orrock; James I Watling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mixed-species herding levels the landscape of fear.

Authors:  Keenan Stears; Melissa H Schmitt; Christopher C Wilmers; Adrian M Shrader
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Notonecta exhibit threat-sensitive, predator-induced dispersal.

Authors:  Shannon J McCauley; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Body downsizing caused by non-consumptive social stress severely depresses population growth rate.

Authors:  Eric Edeline; Thrond O Haugen; Finn-Arne Weltzien; David Claessen; Ian J Winfield; Nils Chr Stenseth; L Asbjørn Vøllestad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Endogenous spatial pattern formation from two intersecting ecological mechanisms: the dynamic coexistence of two noxious invasive ant species in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  John Vandermeer; Ivette Perfecto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Graham A Montgomery; Lauren P Luscuskie; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Restricting prey dispersal can overestimate the importance of predation in trophic cascades.

Authors:  Nathan R Geraldi; Peter I Macreadie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predators and resources influence phosphorus transfer along an invertebrate food web through changes in prey behaviour.

Authors:  Edoardo Calizza; Loreto Rossi; Maria Letizia Costantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-consumptive predator effects shape honey bee foraging and recruitment dancing.

Authors:  Allison Bray; James Nieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.