Literature DB >> 18830667

Why do patients with low-grade soft tissue sarcoma die?

Robert J Canter1, Li-Xuan Qin, Cristina R Ferrone, Robert G Maki, Samuel Singer, Murray F Brennan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The patterns of failure and mechanisms of sarcoma-specific death are poorly characterized among the minority of patients with low-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who succumb to disease.
METHODS: Between 1982 and 2006, 2,041 patients aged >or=16 years with low-grade STS of all sites were treated with curative intent and prospectively followed at a single institution.
RESULTS: Among this cohort, 181 (9%) died from disease (DOD). Overall, 105 patients (58%) died from locally recurrent disease (DOLR), and 59 (32%) died from distant disease (DODR). In 17 patients (9%), the mechanism of sarcoma-related death could not be verified. DOD occurred at a median of 62 months, while median disease-specific survival for the entire cohort was not reached. Median follow-up was 66 months (range 2-431 months). On multivariate analysis, DOD was associated with site, size, and less than R0 resection. For DOLR, site, size, positive margins, liposarcoma histology, and local recurrence (by definition) were significant factors. For DODR, site, histology, and positive margins were not significant factors, while size and local recurrence were. Of DOLR, 80% were retroperitoneal, 68% were liposarcoma, and only 2% were extremity. Conversely, of DODR, extremity (47%) and trunk (18%) were the most common sites, but histology was more variable [liposarcoma 35%, malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) 20%, fibrosarcoma 12%, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma 10%]. High-grade recurrence rates were comparable between DOLR (27%) and DODR (25%).
CONCLUSION: Among patients with low-grade STS, DOD occurs in approximately 9% of patients. Nonextremity site, larger size, and less than R0 resection are the most important risk factors for DOD, and distinct patterns of recurrence and death are predicted by primary tumor site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18830667      PMCID: PMC2605207          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0163-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  26 in total

1.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The role of the pathologist in the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  S I Hajdu; M H Shiu; M F Brennan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prognostic factors in adult patients with locally controlled soft tissue sarcoma. A study of 546 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  J M Coindre; P Terrier; N B Bui; F Bonichon; F Collin; V Le Doussal; A M Mandard; M O Vilain; J Jacquemier; H Duplay; X Sastre; C Barlier; M Henry-Amar; J Macé-Lesech; G Contesso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prognostic factors predictive of survival and local recurrence for extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  S Singer; J M Corson; R Gonin; B Labow; T J Eberlein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Refinement of clinicopathologic staging for localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: a study of 423 adults.

Authors:  J J Gaynor; C C Tan; E S Casper; C F Collin; C Friedrich; M Shiu; S I Hajdu; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Analysis of survival by tumor response.

Authors:  J R Anderson; K C Cain; R D Gelber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases.

Authors:  J Costa; R A Wesley; E Glatstein; S A Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system.

Authors:  M Trojani; G Contesso; J M Coindre; J Rouesse; N B Bui; A de Mascarel; J F Goussot; M David; F Bonichon; C Lagarde
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1984-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Long-term outcome in 87 patients with low-grade soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  S G Marcus; M J Merino; E Glatstein; T F DeLaney; S M Steinberg; S A Rosenberg; J C Yang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-12

10.  Low-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Analysis of risk factors for metastasis.

Authors:  J H Donohue; C Collin; C Friedrich; J Godbold; S I Hajdu; M F Brennan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Principles in Management of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Aimee M Crago; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2015-05-05

2.  [Isolated limb perfusion for liposarcoma : Histopathological response and subgroup analysis after TNF melphalan-based ILP].

Authors:  L E Podleska; B Schwindenhammer; F Grabellus; S Bauer; H-U Steinau; G Taeger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Growth patterns of lung metastases from sarcomas.

Authors:  Stefan Welter; Florian Grabellus; Sebastian Bauer; Kurt Werner Schmid; Georgios Stamatis; Martin Tötsch
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy is predictive of oncological outcome in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Dhruvil Shah; Dariusz Borys; Steve R Martinez; Chin-Shang Li; Robert M Tamurian; Richard J Bold; Arta Monjazeb; Robert J Canter
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Multiple spinal metastases from a well-differentiated liposarcoma of the iliac wing: a case report.

Authors:  A Ben Nsir; A Boubaker; A Z Kassar; K Abderrahmen; N Kchir; H Jemel
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2015-07-09

7.  Preoperative Biopsy in Patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Usage and Outcomes in a National Cohort.

Authors:  Richard J Straker; Yun Song; Adrienne B Shannon; Clayton T Marcinak; John T Miura; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Combining targeted agents with modern radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Philip Wong; Peter Houghton; David G Kirsch; Steven E Finkelstein; Arta M Monjazeb; Meng Xu-Welliver; Adam P Dicker; Mansoor Ahmed; Bhadrasain Vikram; Beverly A Teicher; C Norman Coleman; Mitchell Machtay; Walter J Curran; Dian Wang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Radiographic and histologic response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Robert J Canter; Steve R Martinez; Robert M Tamurian; Maaya Wilton; Chin-Shang Li; Janice Ryu; Walter Mak; Wayne L Monsky; Dariusz Borys
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Semi-automated volumetric quantification of tumor necrosis in soft tissue sarcoma using contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Wayne L Monsky; Bedro Jin; Chris Molloy; Robert J Canter; Chin Shang Li; Tzu C Lin; Daniel Borys; Walter Mack; Isaac Kim; Michael H Buonocore; Abhijit J Chaudhari
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.480

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.