Literature DB >> 1634922

Refinement of clinicopathologic staging for localized soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity: a study of 423 adults.

J J Gaynor1, C C Tan, E S Casper, C F Collin, C Friedrich, M Shiu, S I Hajdu, M F Brennan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic value of factors used in clinicopathologic staging of localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity were analyzed comprehensively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-three patients with STS that was confined to the extremity were admitted to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1968 to 1978. Cox models for the hazards rates of tumor mortality, development of a distant metastasis, strictly local recurrence, and postmetastasis survival were developed. Tests of changes in the prognostic value of the important variables over time were performed, as well as an analysis of the effect of a local recurrence on the hazard rate of distant metastasis.
RESULTS: Three unfavorable characteristics contained independent prognostic value for the rates of distant metastasis and tumor mortality: high grade (P less than .00001), deep location (P less than .0002), and size greater than or equal to 5 cm (P less than .007). Their Cox model coefficients did not differ significantly (P greater than or equal to .65); thus, a staging scheme based on the risk of ever developing a distant metastasis would assign equal prognostic weights to grade, depth, and size. The tumor grade effect during the initial 18 months was much larger in magnitude than those for depth and size, and its effect disappeared beyond that time (P = .0003). Thus, a staging scheme based on the risk of early metastatic spread would assign a distinctly larger prognostic weight to grade and lesser but equal weights to depth and size. There was no local recurrence effect on the rate of distant metastasis in the high-risk group (high grade, deep, and greater than or equal to 5 cm; P = .75), but there was a significant association among the remaining groups combined (P = .0039). The magnitude of this association actually increased according to the number of favorable characteristics presented (P = .0024).
CONCLUSIONS: The refinement of clinicopathologic staging may depend on the choice of outcome variable: ultimate prognosis versus early metastatic spread. Additionally, the observed local recurrence effect may be explained by a tendency for some patients to acquire one or more unfavorable risk factors at the time of local recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1634922     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.8.1317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  Do surgical margin and local recurrence influence survival in soft tissue sarcomas?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Bahtiyar Demiralp; Joseph Alderete; Melissa C Larson; Peter S Rose; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Index Finger Pollicization for Functional Preservation of the Hand After Giant Liposarcoma Resection of the Thenar Eminence.

Authors:  Pierluigi Tos; Raimondo Piana; Elena Boux; Giulia Colzani; Stefano Artiaco
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2015-01-09

3.  Prognostic relevance of a novel proliferation marker, Ki-S11, for soft-tissue sarcoma. A multivariate study.

Authors:  P Rudolph; U Kellner; A Chassevent; F Collin; F Bonichon; R Parwaresch; J M Coindre
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor and melphalan for limb salvage in 186 patients with locally advanced soft tissue extremity sarcomas. The cumulative multicenter European experience.

Authors:  A M Eggermont; H Schraffordt Koops; J M Klausner; B B Kroon; P M Schlag; D Liénard; A N van Geel; H J Hoekstra; I Meller; O E Nieweg; C Kettelhack; G Ben-Ari; J C Pector; F J Lejeune
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity.

Authors:  T M Cooper; M Sheehan; D Collins; T P O'Connor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  What Factors Influence the Outcome of Surgically Treated Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Hand and Wrist?

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Brian E Walczak; Benjamin K Wilke; Sanjeev Kakar; Peter S Rose; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-10-03

7.  A retrospective statistical analysis of high-grade soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Gregory G Kolovich; Adam N Wooldridge; Jonathan M Christy; Martha K Crist; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  [Diagnostics and treatment strategies for soft tissue sarcomas].

Authors:  G Taeger; S Ruchholtz; J Schütte; D Nast-Kolb
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Autophagy: a novel mechanism of synergistic cytotoxicity between doxorubicin and roscovitine in a sarcoma model.

Authors:  Laura A Lambert; Na Qiao; Kelly K Hunt; Donald H Lambert; Gordon B Mills; Laurent Meijer; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Expression of insulin-like growth factor mitogenic signals in adult soft-tissue sarcomas: significant correlation with malignant potential.

Authors:  Lill-Tove R Busund; Kim T Ow; Pamela Russell; Philip J Crowe; Jia-Lin Yang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.