BACKGROUND: The amount of time devoted to musculoskeletal medicine in the typical undergraduate curriculum is disproportionately low compared with the frequency of musculoskeletal complaints that occur in a general practice. Consequently, whether because of the quantity or quality of the education, the competence level of graduating physicians regarding musculoskeletal problems is inadequate. Our purposes were to design a self-contained, system-based course in musculoskeletal medicine for medical students in the preclinical years and to measure the level of competence achieved by a class of first-year medical students who took the course. METHODS: The course was formulated by faculty from the departments of orthopaedic surgery, anatomy, and rheumatology and included elements of both objectives-based and problem-centered curricular models. The clinical lectures were preceded by pertinent anatomy lectures and dissections to provide a context for the clinical information. The lectures on basic science were designed to rationalize and explicate clinical practices. Small-group activities were incorporated to permit engagement of the students in critical thinking and problem-solving. A general musculoskeletal physical examination was taught in two two-hour-long small-group sessions with the orthopaedic residents serving as instructors. Cognitive competency was evaluated with use of comprehensive anatomy laboratory and written examinations, the latter of which included a validated basic competency examination in musculoskeletal medicine. Process-based skills were evaluated in the small-group meetings and in a timed, mock patient encounter in which each student's ability to perform the general musculoskeletal physical examination was assessed. RESULTS: The course lasted six weeks and consisted of forty-four lecture hours, seventeen hours of small-group meetings, and twenty-eight hours of anatomy laboratory. The average student score on the basic competency examination was 77.8%, compared with 59.6% for a historical comparison group (p < 0.05). Each student demonstrated the ability to adequately perform a general musculoskeletal physical examination in twenty minutes. The survey of student opinion after the course indicated a high level of student satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The main features of the course were: (1) an emphasis on both cognitive and process-based knowledge; (2) more contact hours and broader content than in previously described courses in musculoskeletal medicine; (3) the use of small groups to focus on problem-solving and physical examination competencies; (4) basic-science content directly related to clinical goals. These features might be used at other institutions that employ a system-based curriculum for the preclinical years to help improve competence in musculoskeletal medicine.
BACKGROUND: The amount of time devoted to musculoskeletal medicine in the typical undergraduate curriculum is disproportionately low compared with the frequency of musculoskeletal complaints that occur in a general practice. Consequently, whether because of the quantity or quality of the education, the competence level of graduating physicians regarding musculoskeletal problems is inadequate. Our purposes were to design a self-contained, system-based course in musculoskeletal medicine for medical students in the preclinical years and to measure the level of competence achieved by a class of first-year medical students who took the course. METHODS: The course was formulated by faculty from the departments of orthopaedic surgery, anatomy, and rheumatology and included elements of both objectives-based and problem-centered curricular models. The clinical lectures were preceded by pertinent anatomy lectures and dissections to provide a context for the clinical information. The lectures on basic science were designed to rationalize and explicate clinical practices. Small-group activities were incorporated to permit engagement of the students in critical thinking and problem-solving. A general musculoskeletal physical examination was taught in two two-hour-long small-group sessions with the orthopaedic residents serving as instructors. Cognitive competency was evaluated with use of comprehensive anatomy laboratory and written examinations, the latter of which included a validated basic competency examination in musculoskeletal medicine. Process-based skills were evaluated in the small-group meetings and in a timed, mock patient encounter in which each student's ability to perform the general musculoskeletal physical examination was assessed. RESULTS: The course lasted six weeks and consisted of forty-four lecture hours, seventeen hours of small-group meetings, and twenty-eight hours of anatomy laboratory. The average student score on the basic competency examination was 77.8%, compared with 59.6% for a historical comparison group (p < 0.05). Each student demonstrated the ability to adequately perform a general musculoskeletal physical examination in twenty minutes. The survey of student opinion after the course indicated a high level of student satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The main features of the course were: (1) an emphasis on both cognitive and process-based knowledge; (2) more contact hours and broader content than in previously described courses in musculoskeletal medicine; (3) the use of small groups to focus on problem-solving and physical examination competencies; (4) basic-science content directly related to clinical goals. These features might be used at other institutions that employ a system-based curriculum for the preclinical years to help improve competence in musculoskeletal medicine.