Literature DB >> 18829916

Total shoulder arthroplasty with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component. Medium to long-term results.

Michael J Taunton1, Amy L McIntosh, John W Sperling, Robert H Cofield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loosening of a cemented glenoid component is an important cause of failure in shoulder arthroplasty. This study was developed to examine the outcome of patients managed with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component as an alternative to a cemented component.
METHODS: The study group included eighty-three total shoulder arthroplasties with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component performed between 1989 and 1994. Seventy-four shoulders had a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis, and nine shoulders had other diagnoses. All patients were followed radiographically and clinically for a minimum of two years or until the time of revision surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were performed with revision and/or radiographic failure as the end points.
RESULTS: The mean clinical follow-up was 9.5 years, and the mean radiographic follow-up was 7.1 years. Pain ratings (on a scale of 1 to 5) decreased from a mean of 4.7 preoperatively to 2.0 postoperatively. The mean range of motion in active elevation increased from 102 degrees preoperatively to 135 degrees postoperatively; the mean external rotation increased from 27 degrees to 56 degrees . Glenohumeral joint instability developed in fourteen shoulders. Radiographic changes consistent with glenoid component loosening were present in thirty-three shoulders. Polyethylene wear with metal wear of the glenoid component was noted in twenty-one shoulders, and humeral component loosening was seen in fifteen shoulders. Revision procedures were performed in twenty-six shoulders. There were no identifiable patient, disease, or surgical characteristics associated with failure, either clinically or radiographically. The five-year survival estimate free of revision or radiographic failure was 79.9% (95% confidence interval, 71.6% to 89.3%), and the ten-year survival estimate was 51.9% (95% confidence interval, 41.0% to 65.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of failure of total shoulder arthroplasties performed with this metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component raises concerns as to its use, and perhaps the use of other types of metal-backed components, in shoulder arthroplasty, other than for special situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18829916     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  29 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): no differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Bernhard Jost
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Platform systems in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Joshua S Dines; David M Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

3.  Prospective midterm results of a new convertible glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study.

Authors:  Petra Magosch; Sven Lichtenberg; Mark Tauber; Frank Martetschläger; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-01

5.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.

Authors:  M O Gauci; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; M Baba; G Walch; P Boileau
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008).

Authors:  J A Singh; J W Sperling; R H Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-11

8.  No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; K Lauchlan Chambers; Russell F Warren; David M Dines; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Schrumpf; Travis Maak; Sommer Hammoud; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

10.  A convertible shoulder system: is it useful in total shoulder arthroplasty revisions?

Authors:  Jean Kany; Thomas Amouyel; Olivier Flamand; Denis Katz; Philippe Valenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.