BACKGROUND: Frailty involves decrements in many physiologic systems, is prevalent in older ages, and is characterized by increased vulnerability to disability and mortality. It is yet unclear how this geriatric syndrome relates to a preclinical cumulative marker of multisystem dysregulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether allostatic load (AL) was associated with the geriatric syndrome of frailty in older community-dwelling women. METHODS: We examined the cross-sectional relationship between AL and a validated measure of frailty in the baseline examination of two complementary population-based cohort studies, the Women's Health and Aging studies (WHAS) I and II. This sample of 728 women had an age range of 70-79. We used ordinal logistic regression to estimate the relationship between AL and frailty controlling for covariates. RESULTS: About 10% of women were frail and 46% were prefrail. AL ranged from 0 to 8 with 91% of participants scoring between 0 and 4. Regression models showed that a unit increase in the AL score was associated with increasing levels of frailty (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.04-1.28) controlling for race, age, education, smoking status, and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that frailty is associated with AL. The observed relationship provides some support for the hypothesis that accumulation of physiological dysregulation may be related to the loss of reserve characterized by frailty.
BACKGROUND: Frailty involves decrements in many physiologic systems, is prevalent in older ages, and is characterized by increased vulnerability to disability and mortality. It is yet unclear how this geriatric syndrome relates to a preclinical cumulative marker of multisystem dysregulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether allostatic load (AL) was associated with the geriatric syndrome of frailty in older community-dwelling women. METHODS: We examined the cross-sectional relationship between AL and a validated measure of frailty in the baseline examination of two complementary population-based cohort studies, the Women's Health and Aging studies (WHAS) I and II. This sample of 728 women had an age range of 70-79. We used ordinal logistic regression to estimate the relationship between AL and frailty controlling for covariates. RESULTS: About 10% of women were frail and 46% were prefrail. AL ranged from 0 to 8 with 91% of participants scoring between 0 and 4. Regression models showed that a unit increase in the AL score was associated with increasing levels of frailty (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.04-1.28) controlling for race, age, education, smoking status, and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that frailty is associated with AL. The observed relationship provides some support for the hypothesis that accumulation of physiological dysregulation may be related to the loss of reserve characterized by frailty.
Authors: Howard Bergman; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik; David B Hogan; Silvia Hummel; Sathya Karunananthan; Christina Wolfson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Marjolein Visser; Marco Pahor; Dennis R Taaffe; Bret H Goodpaster; Eleanor M Simonsick; Anne B Newman; Michael Nevitt; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Teresa E Seeman; Burton H Singer; Carol D Ryff; Gayle Dienberg Love; Lené Levy-Storms Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Willem J Kop; John S Gottdiener; Catherine M Tangen; Linda P Fried; Mary Ann McBurnie; Jeremy Walston; Anne Newman; Calvin Hirsch; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Arun S Karlamangla; Burton H Singer; Bruce S McEwen; John W Rowe; Teresa E Seeman Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Erik J Rodriquez; Edward N Kim; Anne E Sumner; Anna M Nápoles; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Marco Pahor; Jack M Guralnik; Walter T Ambrosius; Steven Blair; Denise E Bonds; Timothy S Church; Mark A Espeland; Roger A Fielding; Thomas M Gill; Erik J Groessl; Abby C King; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Todd M Manini; Mary M McDermott; Michael E Miller; Anne B Newman; W Jack Rejeski; Kaycee M Sink; Jeff D Williamson Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Deborah A Lekan; Debra C Wallace; Thomas P McCoy; Jie Hu; Susan G Silva; Heather E Whitson Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Alan A Cohen; Emmanuel Milot; Jian Yong; Christopher L Seplaki; Tamàs Fülöp; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Linda P Fried Journal: Mech Ageing Dev Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 5.432