Literature DB >> 18828866

Regulation of cancer stem cells by p53.

D Joseph Jerry1, Luwei Tao, Haoheng Yan.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that cancer stem cells are responsible for the chemoresistant and metastatic phenotypes of many breast cancers has gained support using cell-sorting strategies to enrich the tumor-initiating population of cells. The mechanisms regulating the cancer stem cell pool, however, are less clear. Two recent publications suggest that loss of p53 permits expansion of presumptive cancer stem cells in mouse mammary tumors and in human breast cell lines. These results add restriction of cancer stem cells as a new tumor suppressor activity attributed to p53.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18828866      PMCID: PMC2575544          DOI: 10.1186/bcr2133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


Enrichment of tumor-initiating cells in p53-deficient mammary tumor models

The recent identification and characterization of stem cells in a variety of adult tissues has led to renewed interest in the role of stem cells in cancers. Cancer stem cells are hypothesized to be a small population of cells within a tumor that are capable of self-renewal and that can undergo differentiation to generate the phenotypic heterogeneity observed in tumors. Contemporary methods for studying cancer stem cells have most often used cell surface markers to enrich the subset of cells capable of initiating a tumor upon transplantation into an appropriate host. Molecular pathways that limit expansion of the tumor-initiating cell population could be targeted to eradicate tumors. Using mammary tumors arising spontaneously from transplants of BALB/c-Trp53-/- mammary epithelium, Zhang and coworkers show that cells expressing markers of mouse mammary stem cells (lin-/CD29hi/CD24hi) had a greater tumor-initiating frequency [1]. This observation was consistent among tumors with heterogeneous expression of markers for the luminal epithelium and the basal epithelium. The lin-/CD29hi/CD24hi population shared additional features of mammary stem cells, including radiation resistance and the formation of secondary mammospheres. But how might loss of p53 lead to formation or expansion of the tumor-initiating pool? Using a unique culture model of luminal breast epithelial cells (BPEC-T), Godar and coworkers demonstrate that p53 binds to the promoter of CD44 [2], a commonly used marker of cancer stem cells [3], and represses CD44 expression. Constitutive expression of CD44 blocked p53-dependent apoptosis and rendered cells resistant to doxorubicin. Conversely, suppression of CD44 expression restricted tumor-initiating cells. These results link the loss of p53 function to increased expression of CD44, which promotes expansion of tumor-initiating cells purified in tumors. The p53 protein appears to play a similar role in embryonic stem cells, where p53 represses expression of Nanog – which limits the pool of pluripotent cells [4,5]. In contrast, loss of p53 extends the repopulating activity of tissue-specific stem cells [6,7]. Disruption of BRCA1 also allows expansion of breast stem cells [8]. The restriction of stem cells may therefore be a fundamental pathway for tumor suppression.

Reading between the cell lines

While expansion of the tumor-initiating cell population in p53-deficient mammary epithelial cells is consistent in both mouse mammary and human breast epithelial cells, the role of CD44 is not. Although loss of p53 expression resulted in increased levels of CD44 protein in BPEC-T cells and in basal mammary epithelium of Trp53-/- mice [2], there was no enrichment for tumor-initiating cells within the CD44+/CD24-population in BALB/c-Trp53-/- mammary tumors [1]. This apparent discrepancy points to heterogeneity in the expression of markers among cancer stem cells. In mammary tumors from Brca1Δ/Trp53+/- mice, two discrete tumor-initiating populations were identified that express either CD44+/CD24-or CD133+ [9]. As coexpression of CD44 and CD133 was not detected in these pools of cells, it appears that CD44 is not essential for sustaining the pool of cancer stem cells. Indeed, p53 represses expression of more than 20 target genes [10] that may contribute to maintenance of the pool of tumor-initiating cells. Genes such as Nanog may have direct actions in supporting self-renewal of cancer stem cells, allowing the pool to expand. Loss of p53 would also allow increased expression of the multidrug-resistance gene (ABCB1 or MDR1) that renders cells resistant to chemotherapies. Similarly, both increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis would be expected to result from de-repression of CDC25C and BIRC5/Survivin when p53 function is disrupted. CD44 may therefore be only one mechanism by which p53 may act to restrict the tumor-initiating population of cancer cells.

Cancer stem cells: puppet or puppeteer?

It is clear that that p53 plays a pivotal role in tumor suppression. Mutation and loss of function of p53 are among the most common alterations in epithelial cancers [11], and gene expression signatures associated with dysfunctional p53 have been shown to predict patient survival [12,13]. The p53 protein regulates a variety of pathways (cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, DNA repair, senescence and autophagy) that can contribute to suppression of tumors. The publications by Zhang and colleagues and by Godar and colleagues now add suppression of cancer stem cells as an additional activity by which p53 can inhibit tumors [1,2]. So which of these pathways dominate? The answer will have significant impact on therapeutic strategies. On the one hand, loss of p53 may promote genetic instability – resulting in plasticity of phenotypes due to random mutations and clonal evolution (Figure 1). In this model, the behavior of the p53-deficient cancer cells would be stochastic and would require therapeutics targeting multiple oncogenic pathways. If the apparent phenotypic plasticity of p53-deficient breast tumors is due to the expansion of the cancer stem cell pool, however, therapies targeting the self-renewal pathways may be extremely effective. Loss of p53 function in breast tumors is strongly correlated with the basal-like gene expression signatures [14,15]. This suggest that either these tumors originate from breast stem cells or that loss of p53 allows cancer cells to acquire characteristics of stem cells. These results favor the possibility that p53 deficiency allows expansion of cancer stem cells and that the expression profiles of tumor-initiating cells will identify effective therapeutic targets.
Figure 1

Loss of p53 function and effects on tumor heterogeneity. In normal epithelia, p53 represses expression of potential oncogenes (for example, CD44, NANOG, BIRC5, CDC25C) as well as transcriptionally activating tumor suppressor pathways [10]. Loss of p53 allows genetic instability as well as expansion or acquisition of stem cell features during carcinogenesis. These pathways combine to generate the phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity observed in tumors.

Loss of p53 function and effects on tumor heterogeneity. In normal epithelia, p53 represses expression of potential oncogenes (for example, CD44, NANOG, BIRC5, CDC25C) as well as transcriptionally activating tumor suppressor pathways [10]. Loss of p53 allows genetic instability as well as expansion or acquisition of stem cell features during carcinogenesis. These pathways combine to generate the phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity observed in tumors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  15 in total

1.  Regulation of apoptosis and differentiation by p53 in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Han Qin; Tianxin Yu; Tingting Qing; Yanxia Liu; Yang Zhao; Jun Cai; Jian Li; Zhihua Song; Xiuxia Qu; Peng Zhou; Jiong Wu; Mingxiao Ding; Hongkui Deng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  p53 suppresses the self-renewal of adult neural stem cells.

Authors:  Konstantinos Meletis; Valtteri Wirta; Sanna-Maria Hede; Monica Nistér; Joakim Lundeberg; Jonas Frisén
Journal:  Development       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survival.

Authors:  Lance D Miller; Johanna Smeds; Joshy George; Vinsensius B Vega; Liza Vergara; Alexander Ploner; Yudi Pawitan; Per Hall; Sigrid Klaar; Edison T Liu; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The impact of altered p53 dosage on hematopoietic stem cell dynamics during aging.

Authors:  Melissa Dumble; Lynette Moore; Stuart M Chambers; Hartmut Geiger; Gary Van Zant; Margaret A Goodell; Lawrence A Donehower
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Growth-inhibitory and tumor- suppressive functions of p53 depend on its repression of CD44 expression.

Authors:  Samuel Godar; Tan A Ince; George W Bell; David Feldser; Joana Liu Donaher; Jonas Bergh; Anne Liu; Kevin Miu; Randolph S Watnick; Ferenc Reinhardt; Sandra S McAllister; Tyler Jacks; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Laura D Wood; D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Jimmy Lin; Tobias Sjöblom; Rebecca J Leary; Dong Shen; Simina M Boca; Thomas Barber; Janine Ptak; Natalie Silliman; Steve Szabo; Zoltan Dezso; Vadim Ustyanksky; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Rachel Karchin; Paul A Wilson; Joshua S Kaminker; Zemin Zhang; Randal Croshaw; Joseph Willis; Dawn Dawson; Michail Shipitsin; James K V Willson; Saraswati Sukumar; Kornelia Polyak; Ben Ho Park; Charit L Pethiyagoda; P V Krishna Pant; Dennis G Ballinger; Andrew B Sparks; James Hartigan; Douglas R Smith; Erick Suh; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Phillip Buckhaults; Sanford D Markowitz; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kenneth W Kinzler; Victor E Velculescu; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Gene expression patterns associated with p53 status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A Troester; Jason I Herschkowitz; Daniel S Oh; Xiaping He; Katherine A Hoadley; Claire S Barbier; Charles M Perou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Karl Simin; Victor J Weigman; Igor Mikaelian; Jerry Usary; Zhiyuan Hu; Karen E Rasmussen; Laundette P Jones; Shahin Assefnia; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Michael G Backlund; Yuzhi Yin; Andrey I Khramtsov; Roy Bastein; John Quackenbush; Robert I Glazer; Powel H Brown; Jeffrey E Green; Levy Kopelovich; Priscilla A Furth; Juan P Palazzo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Philip S Bernard; Gary A Churchill; Terry Van Dyke; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anita Langerød; Hongjuan Zhao; Ørnulf Borgan; Jahn M Nesland; Ida R K Bukholm; Tone Ikdahl; Rolf Kåresen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of stem cell plasticity: mechanisms and relevance to tissue biology and cancer.

Authors:  Robert Strauss; Petra Hamerlik; André Lieber; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Nanoparticle-mediated p53 gene therapy for tumor inhibition.

Authors:  Blanka Sharma; Wenxue Ma; Isaac Morris Adjei; Jayanth Panyam; Sanja Dimitrijevic; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 3.  Crosstalk of Notch with p53 and p63 in cancer growth control.

Authors:  G Paolo Dotto
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  A miR-34a-SIRT6 axis in the squamous cell differentiation network.

Authors:  Karine Lefort; Yang Brooks; Paola Ostano; Muriel Cario-André; Valérie Calpini; Juan Guinea-Viniegra; Andrea Albinger-Hegyi; Wolfram Hoetzenecker; Ingrid Kolfschoten; Erwin F Wagner; Sabine Werner; Gian Paolo Dotto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Caveolin-1 regulates lung cancer stem-like cell induction and p53 inactivation in carbon nanotube-driven tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Sudjit Luanpitpong; Liying Wang; Todd A Stueckle; William Tse; Yi Charlie Chen; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-06-15

6.  Transcriptional repression of cancer stem cell marker CD133 by tumor suppressor p53.

Authors:  E K Park; J C Lee; J W Park; S Y Bang; S A Yi; B K Kim; J H Park; S H Kwon; J S You; S W Nam; E J Cho; J W Han
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 8.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.