STUDY DESIGN: Experimental dog model of acute spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative value of methylprednisolone, surgical decompression, or both for the treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Acute spinal cord injury results from both primary damage to the spinal cord at the time of the initial injury as well as a deleterious secondary cascade of events, which leads to further damage. Surgical decompression is known to improve clinical outcomes, but the timing of surgical decompression remains controversial. METHODS: A nylon tie was used to constrict the spinal cord in 18 adult male beagle dogs. The animals were then prospectively randomized to 3 groups: 1) surgical decompression at 6 hours and intravenous methylprednisolone; 2) surgical decompression at 6 hours and intravenous saline; and 3) intravenous methylprednisolone without surgical decompression. Each animal was evaluated by somatosensory-evoked potentials, daily neurologic assessment, and histologic examination at 2 weeks following injury. RESULTS: Immediately following spinal cord constriction, all animals were paraplegic, incontinent, and the somatosensory-evoked potentials were abolished. Surgical decompression 6 hours after injury, with or without methylprednisolone, led to significantly better neurologic function at 2 weeks than methylprednisolone alone. CONCLUSION: In the setting of acute and persistent spinal cord compression in beagle dogs, surgical decompression 6 hours after injury, with or without methylprednisolone, is more effective for improving neurologic recovery than methylprednisolone alone.
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental dog model of acute spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative value of methylprednisolone, surgical decompression, or both for the treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Acute spinal cord injury results from both primary damage to the spinal cord at the time of the initial injury as well as a deleterious secondary cascade of events, which leads to further damage. Surgical decompression is known to improve clinical outcomes, but the timing of surgical decompression remains controversial. METHODS: A nylon tie was used to constrict the spinal cord in 18 adult male beagle dogs. The animals were then prospectively randomized to 3 groups: 1) surgical decompression at 6 hours and intravenous methylprednisolone; 2) surgical decompression at 6 hours and intravenous saline; and 3) intravenous methylprednisolone without surgical decompression. Each animal was evaluated by somatosensory-evoked potentials, daily neurologic assessment, and histologic examination at 2 weeks following injury. RESULTS: Immediately following spinal cord constriction, all animals were paraplegic, incontinent, and the somatosensory-evoked potentials were abolished. Surgical decompression 6 hours after injury, with or without methylprednisolone, led to significantly better neurologic function at 2 weeks than methylprednisolone alone. CONCLUSION: In the setting of acute and persistent spinal cord compression in beagle dogs, surgical decompression 6 hours after injury, with or without methylprednisolone, is more effective for improving neurologic recovery than methylprednisolone alone.
Authors: Marcel F Dvorak; Vanessa K Noonan; Nader Fallah; Charles G Fisher; Joel Finkelstein; Brian K Kwon; Carly S Rivers; Henry Ahn; Jérôme Paquet; Eve C Tsai; Andrea Townson; Najmedden Attabib; Christopher S Bailey; Sean D Christie; Brian Drew; Daryl R Fourney; Richard Fox; R John Hurlbert; Michael G Johnson; A G Linassi; Stefan Parent; Michael G Fehlings Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: A P Verheyden; A Hölzl; H Ekkerlein; E Gercek; S Hauck; C Josten; F Kandziora; S Katscher; C Knop; W Lehmann; R Meffert; C W Müller; A Partenheimer; C Schinkel; P Schleicher; K J Schnake; M Scholz; C Ulrich Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Bizhan Aarabi; J Marc Simard; Joseph A Kufera; Melvin Alexander; Katie M Zacherl; Stuart E Mirvis; Kathirkamanthan Shanmuganathan; Gary Schwartzbauer; Christopher M Maulucci; Justin Slavin; Khawar Ali; Jennifer Massetti; Howard M Eisenberg Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2012-07-13
Authors: Jared T Wilcox; Jonathan K Y Lai; Esther Semple; Brigitte A Brisson; Cathy Gartley; John N Armstrong; Dean H Betts Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter E Batchelor; Taryn E Wills; Peta Skeers; Camila R Battistuzzo; Malcolm R Macleod; David W Howells; Emily S Sena Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 3.240