Literature DB >> 18825394

Differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a dynamic in vitro measurement.

Adrian Skwara1, Carsten O Tibesku, Sven Ostermeier, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anterior knee pain is one of the most common problems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mobile-bearing designs should improve patella tracking with a reduced rate of patella tilt as well as reduced patellofemoral contact stresses and improve knee flexion. The aim of this dynamic in vitro investigation was to evaluate the changes of patellofemoral contact stresses after TKA using fixed and mobile-bearing designs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven knee specimens were mounted into a knee simulator imitating an isokinetic extension of the knee. The patellofemoral contact was measured before and after tricompartimental TKA with fixed and mobile-bearing designs using pressure-sensitive films. Contact stresses were measured from 120 degrees knee flexion to full extension with a simulated force of the quadriceps muscle up to 1,200 N. Additionally all measurements were performed with simulated co-contraction of the hamstrings muscles.
RESULTS: Fixed-bearing TKA increases patellofemoral contact stresses compared to physiologic conditions. After patella resurfacing, contact stresses increase even more. By changing the prosthesis design to mobile bearing, maximum contact stress was measured to be punctual higher than in fixed-bearing implants. In the interval between 0 degrees -30 degrees and 70 degrees -105 degrees of flexion, obviously lower pressures were evaluated for the mobile-bearing design. With cocontraction of the hamstrings, a lower contact stress of the mobile-bearing design was evident for the complete measurement of the knee extension.
CONCLUSION: An increase of patellofemoral contact stresses after patellar resurfacing in TKA could be demonstrated. This outcome implicates a higher risk of patellofemoral complications. The mobile-bearing design showed evidently lower patellofemoral contact stresses than the fixed-bearing design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18825394     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0757-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  12 in total

1.  Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Kiriakos Daniilidis; Steffen Höll; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Nicolo Martinelli; Sven Ostermeier; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patellofemoral kinematics in mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing posterior stabilised total knee replacements: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  G Heinert; D Kendoff; S Preiss; T Gehrke; P Sussmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and contact characteristics.

Authors:  Hans Kainz; Wolfgang Reng; Peter Augat; Simone Wurm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  No difference in patellar position between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty for medial osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Felipe Galvão A de Abreu; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Romain Gaillard; Philippe Neyret; Sebastien Lustig; Elvire Servien
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The Rotaglide+ total knee replacement: a comparison of mobile versus fixed bearings.

Authors:  Lorcan McGonagle; Louisa Bethell; Natalie Byrne; Ben G Bolton-Maggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  External rotation of the femoral component decreases patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Terashima; Tomohiro Onodera; Naohiro Sawaguchi; Yasuhiko Kasahara; Tokifumi Majima
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A dutch survey on circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Alexander F W Barnaart; Cees C P M Verheyen
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-06-22

8.  Different femorotibial contact points between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKAs do not show clinical impact.

Authors:  R A van Stralen; P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Patella position is not a determinant for anterior knee pain 10 years after balanced gap total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Albert H van Houten; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in terms of patellofemoral pain and function: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  P Z Feczko; L M Jutten; M J van Steyn; P Deckers; P J Emans; J J Arts
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.