Literature DB >> 18823827

Structural variants of biodegradable polyesterurethane in vivo evoke a cellular and angiogenic response that is dictated by architecture.

Jerome A Henry1, Krishna Burugapalli, Peter Neuenschwander, Abhay Pandit.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate an in vivo tissue response to a biodegradable polyesterurethane, specifically the cellular and angiogenic response evoked by varying implant architectures in a subcutaneous rabbit implant model. A synthetic biodegradable polyesterurethane was synthesized and processed into three different configurations: a non-porous film, a porous mesh and a porous membrane. Glutaraldehyde cross-linked bovine pericardium was used as a control. Sterile polyesterurethane and control samples were implanted subcutaneously in six rabbits (n=12). The rabbits were killed at 21 and 63 days and the implant sites were sectioned and histologically stained using haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome, picosirius red and immunostain CD31. The tissue-implant interface thickness was measured from the H&E slides. Stereological techniques were used to quantify the tissue reaction at each time point that included volume fraction of inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, fibrocytes, collagen and the degree of vascularization. Stereological analysis inferred that porous scaffolds with regular topography are better tolerated in vivo compared to non-porous scaffolds, while increasing scaffold porosity promotes angiogenesis and cellular infiltration. The results suggest that this biodegradable polyesterurethane is better tolerated in vivo than the control and that structural variants of biodegradable polyesterurethane in vivo evoke a cellular and angiogenic response that is dictated by architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823827     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  12 in total

1.  Biocompatible, degradable thermoplastic polyurethane based on polycaprolactone-block-polytetrahydrofuran-block-polycaprolactone copolymers for soft tissue engineering.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Mi; Xin Jing; Brett N Napiwocki; Breanna S Hagerty; Guojun Chen; Lih-Sheng Turng
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.331

2.  Release of plasmid DNA-encoding IL-10 from PLGA microparticles facilitates long-term reversal of neuropathic pain following a single intrathecal administration.

Authors:  Ryan Gene Soderquist; Evan M Sloane; Lisa C Loram; Jacqueline A Harrison; Ellen C Dengler; Scott M Johnson; Luke D Amer; Courtney S Young; Makenzie T Lewis; Stephen Poole; Matthew G Frank; Linda R Watkins; Erin D Milligan; Melissa J Mahoney
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  In Situ Synthesis of Polyurethane Scaffolds with Tunable Properties by Controlled Crosslinking of Tri-Block Copolymer and Polycaprolactone Triol for Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Mi; Xin Jing; Galip Yilmaz; Breanna S Hagerty; Eduardo Enriquez; Lih-Sheng Turng
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 13.273

4.  Adhesion and collagen production of human tenocytes seeded on degradable poly(urethane urea).

Authors:  Laura Ruzzini; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Stefano Campi; Nicola Maffulli; Andrea Onetti Muda; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Surface characterization of extracellular matrix scaffolds.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Christopher A Barnes; Rena T Kasick; Roger Michel; Thomas W Gilbert; Donna Beer-Stolz; David G Castner; Buddy D Ratner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Electrospinning of novel biodegradable poly(ester urethane)s and poly(ester urethane urea)s for soft tissue-engineering applications.

Authors:  Pablo C Caracciolo; Vinoy Thomas; Yogesh K Vohra; Fabián Buffa; Gustavo A Abraham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Supermacroporous poly(vinyl alcohol)-carboxylmethyl chitosan-poly(ethylene glycol) scaffold: an in vitro and in vivo pre-assessments for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Si-Yuen Lee; Ai-Sze Wee; Chin-Keong Lim; Azlina Amir Abbas; Lakshmi Selvaratnam; Azhar Mahmood Merican; Tunku Sara Ahmad; Tunku Kamarul
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  The promotion of angiogenesis induced by three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold with different interconnection sizes via activation of PI3K/Akt pathways.

Authors:  Xin Xiao; Wei Wang; Dong Liu; Haoqiang Zhang; Peng Gao; Lei Geng; Yulin Yuan; Jianxi Lu; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A clinically relevant in vivo model for the assessment of scaffold efficacy in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cy Chan; Krishna Burugapalli; Yi-Shiang Huang; John L Kelly; Abhay Pandit
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 7.813

10.  Prevention of peritendinous adhesions using an electrospun DegraPol polymer tube: a histological, ultrasonographic, and biomechanical study in rabbits.

Authors:  Gabriella Meier Bürgisser; Maurizio Calcagni; Angela Müller; Eliana Bonavoglia; Gion Fessel; Jess G Snedeker; Pietro Giovanoli; Johanna Buschmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.