CONTEXT: Two learning approaches are consistently distinguished in the literature: deep and surface learning. The deep learning approach is considered preferable. Open-book tests are expected to stimulate deep learning and to offer a possible way of handling the substantial growth in medical knowledge. In this study we test the hypothesis that open-book tests stimulate deep learning more than closed-book tests. METHODS: Medical students in Years 2 (n = 423) and 3 (n = 306) participated in this study. They evaluated their preparation for open- and closed-book tests using the test for Deep Information Processing (DIP). This questionnaire consists of 24 items divided into three subscales: Critical Reading; Broaden One's Context, and Structuring. A paired t-test was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Both cohorts scored significantly higher when preparing for closed-book tests for the overall DIP score and on the Broaden One's Context and Structuring scales. Year 3 students also scored significantly higher on the Critical Reading scale when preparing for closed-book tests. Gender differences were found: women used deeper learning approaches than men. CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis was not supported. In fact, the opposite was found: closed-book tests stimulated a deep learning approach more than open-book tests. Three possible explanations are: deep learning is particularly necessary for remembering and recalling knowledge; students feel more confident when preparing for closed-book tests, and students are more motivated to study for closed-book tests. The debate on the concept of deep learning in higher education should probably be renewed.
CONTEXT: Two learning approaches are consistently distinguished in the literature: deep and surface learning. The deep learning approach is considered preferable. Open-book tests are expected to stimulate deep learning and to offer a possible way of handling the substantial growth in medical knowledge. In this study we test the hypothesis that open-book tests stimulate deep learning more than closed-book tests. METHODS: Medical students in Years 2 (n = 423) and 3 (n = 306) participated in this study. They evaluated their preparation for open- and closed-book tests using the test for Deep Information Processing (DIP). This questionnaire consists of 24 items divided into three subscales: Critical Reading; Broaden One's Context, and Structuring. A paired t-test was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Both cohorts scored significantly higher when preparing for closed-book tests for the overall DIP score and on the Broaden One's Context and Structuring scales. Year 3 students also scored significantly higher on the Critical Reading scale when preparing for closed-book tests. Gender differences were found: women used deeper learning approaches than men. CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis was not supported. In fact, the opposite was found: closed-book tests stimulated a deep learning approach more than open-book tests. Three possible explanations are: deep learning is particularly necessary for remembering and recalling knowledge; students feel more confident when preparing for closed-book tests, and students are more motivated to study for closed-book tests. The debate on the concept of deep learning in higher education should probably be renewed.
Authors: Francois J Cilliers; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Nicoline Herman; Hanelie J Adendorff; Cees P M van der Vleuten Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2011-04-03 Impact factor: 3.853
Authors: M Heijne-Penninga; J B M Kuks; W H A Hofman; A M M Muijtjens; J Cohen-Schotanus Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.853
Authors: Gry Mørk; Trine A Magne; Tove Carstensen; Linda Stigen; Lene A Åsli; Astrid Gramstad; Susanne G Johnson; Tore Bonsaksen Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: P F McLean; D J Davies; P R Kemp; A D Liddle; M J Morrell; O Halse; N M Martin; A H Sam Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 3.853