Literature DB >> 18823206

How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitasking.

Frederick Verbruggen1, Darryl W Schneider, Gordon D Logan.   

Abstract

Multitasking was studied in the stop-change paradigm, in which the response for a primary GO1 task had to be stopped and replaced by a response for a secondary GO2 task on some trials. In 2 experiments, the delay between the stop signal and the change signal was manipulated to determine which task goals (GO1, GO2, or STOP) were involved in performance and to determine whether the goals were activated in series or in parallel. As the delay increased, the probability of responding on stop trials changed very little, but GO2 task reaction times decreased substantially. Such effects are consistent with both a nondeterministic serial model (in which the GO1 goal is replaced by the STOP goal, which is subsequently replaced by the GO2 goal) and a limited-capacity parallel model (in which stopping and GO2 processing occur concurrently) with a capacity-sharing proportion that resembles serial processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823206     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  44 in total

1.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron; Michaël A Stevens; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Daniel J Upton; Peter G Enticott; Rodney J Croft; Nicholas R Cooper; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Two-stage muscle activity responses in decisions about leg movement adjustments during trip recovery.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Mirjam Pijnappels; Sabine Verschueren; Jaap van Dieën; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A causal role of the right inferior frontal cortex in implementing strategies for multi-component behaviour.

Authors:  Gabriel Dippel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Neural control of visual search by frontal eye field: effects of unexpected target displacement on visual selection and saccade preparation.

Authors:  Aditya Murthy; Supriya Ray; Stephanie M Shorter; Jeffrey D Schall; Kirk G Thompson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations.

Authors:  Michael P Claffey; Sarah Sheldon; Cathy M Stinear; Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.