Literature DB >> 18823176

Do conscientious individuals live longer? A quantitative review.

Margaret L Kern1, Howard S Friedman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Following up on growing evidence that higher levels of conscientiousness are associated with greater health protection, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of the association between conscientiousness-related traits and longevity.
DESIGN: Using a random-effects analysis model, the authors statistically combined 20 independent samples. In addition, the authors used fixed-effects analyses to examine specific facets of conscientiousness and study characteristics as potential moderators of this relationship. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effect sizes were computed for each individual sample as the correlation coefficient r, based on the relationship between conscientiousness and mortality risk (all-cause mortality risk, longevity, or length of survival).
RESULTS: Higher levels of conscientiousness were significantly and positively related to longevity (r = .11, 95% confidence interval = .05-.17). Associations were strongest for the achievement (persistent, industrious) and order (organized, disciplined) facets of conscientiousness.
CONCLUSION: Results strongly support the importance of conscientiousness-related traits to health across the life span. Future research and interventions should consider how individual differences in conscientiousness may cause and be shaped by health-relevant biopsychosocial events across many years. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823176     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  110 in total

1.  Impulsivity is an independent predictor of 15-year mortality risk among individuals seeking help for alcohol-related problems.

Authors:  Daniel M Blonigen; Christine Timko; Bernice S Moos; Rudolf H Moos
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC).

Authors:  Joshua J Jackson; Dustin Wood; Tim Bogg; Kate E Walton; Peter D Harms; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2010-08-01

3.  Is Conscientiousness Always Associated With Better Health? A U.S.-Japan Cross-Cultural Examination of Biological Health Risk.

Authors:  Shinobu Kitayama; Jiyoung Park
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2020-06-18

4.  Personality traits and body weight: Evidence using sibling comparisons.

Authors:  Jinho Kim
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  School performance and mortality: The mediating role of educational attainment and work and family trajectories across the life course.

Authors:  Andrew Halpern-Manners; James M Raymo; John R Warren; Kaitlin Johnson
Journal:  Adv Life Course Res       Date:  2020-08-30

6.  On the Contextual Independence of Personality: Teachers' Assessments Predict Directly Observed Behavior after Four Decades.

Authors:  Christopher S Nave; Ryne A Sherman; David C Funder; Sarah E Hampson; Lewis R Goldberg
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2010-07-08

7.  Childhood sleep duration and lifelong mortality risk.

Authors:  Katherine A Duggan; Chandra A Reynolds; Margaret L Kern; Howard S Friedman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  The Science and Practice of Self-Control.

Authors:  Angela L Duckworth; Martin E P Seligman
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Cognitive Control Moderates the Health Benefits of Trait Self-Regulation in Young Adults.

Authors:  Jonathan G Hakun; Margaret A Findeison
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2019-08-30

Review 10.  The case for conscientiousness: evidence and implications for a personality trait marker of health and longevity.

Authors:  Tim Bogg; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.