Literature DB >> 18823129

Energetics of the cleft closing transition and the role of electrostatic interactions in conformational rearrangements of the glutamate receptor ligand binding domain.

Tatyana Mamonova1, Michael J Yonkunas, Maria G Kurnikova.   

Abstract

The ionotropic glutamate receptors are localized in the pre- and postsynaptic membrane of neurons in the brain. Activation by the principal excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate allows the ligand binding domain to change conformation, communicating opening of the channel for ion conduction. The free energy of the GluR2 S1S2 ligand binding domain (S1S2) closure transition was computed using a combination of thermodynamic integration and umbrella sampling modeling methods. A path that involves lowering the charge on E705 was chosen to clarify the role of this binding site residue. A continuum electrostatics approach in S1S2 is used to show E705, located in the ligand binding cleft, stabilizes the closed conformation of S1S2 via direct interactions with other protein residues, not through the ligand. In the closed conformation, in the absence of a ligand, S1S2 is somewhat more closed than what has been reported in X-ray structures. A semiopen conformation has been identified which is characterized by disruption of a single cross-cleft interaction and differs only slightly in energy from the fully closed S1S2. The fully open S1S2 conformation exhibits a wide energy well and shares structural similarity with the apo S1S2 crystal structure. Hybrid continuum electrostatics/MD calculations along the chosen closure transition pathway reveal solvation energies, and electrostatic interaction energies between two lobes of the protein increase the relative energetic difference between the open and closed conformational states. By analyzing the role of several cross-cleft contacts as well as other binding site residues, we demonstrate how S1S2 interactions facilitate formation of the closed conformation of the GluR2 ligand binding domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823129      PMCID: PMC2814871          DOI: 10.1021/bi801367d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  29 in total

1.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models.

Authors:  P A Kollman; I Massova; C Reyes; B Kuhn; S Huo; L Chong; M Lee; T Lee; Y Duan; W Wang; O Donini; P Cieplak; J Srinivasan; D A Case; T E Cheatham
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  Agonist-induced isomerization in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain. A kinetic and mutagenetic analysis.

Authors:  R Abele; K Keinanen; D R Madden
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-sensitive glutamate receptor: crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core.

Authors:  N Armstrong; E Gouaux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Structural basis for AMPA receptor activation and ligand selectivity: crystal structures of five agonist complexes with the GluR2 ligand-binding core.

Authors:  A Hogner; J S Kastrup; R Jin; T Liljefors; M L Mayer; J Egebjerg; I K Larsen; E Gouaux
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Structure and energetics of channel-forming protein-polysaccharide complexes inferred via computational statistical thermodynamics.

Authors:  Tatyana Mamonova; Maria Kurnikova
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Mechanisms for ligand binding to GluR0 ion channels: crystal structures of the glutamate and serine complexes and a closed apo state.

Authors:  M L Mayer; R Olson; E Gouaux
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Ligand--protein interactions in the glutamate receptor.

Authors:  V Jayaraman; R Keesey; D R Madden
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Probing the function, conformational plasticity, and dimer-dimer contacts of the GluR2 ligand-binding core: studies of 5-substituted willardiines and GluR2 S1S2 in the crystal.

Authors:  Rongsheng Jin; Eric Gouaux
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Mechanism of activation and selectivity in a ligand-gated ion channel: structural and functional studies of GluR2 and quisqualate.

Authors:  Rongsheng Jin; Michelle Horning; Mark L Mayer; Eric Gouaux
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-12-31       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the ligand-binding domain of the ionotropic glutamate receptor GluR2.

Authors:  Yalini Arinaminpathy; Mark S P Sansom; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  13 in total

1.  On the mechanisms of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor binding to glutamate and kainate.

Authors:  Michael K Fenwick; Robert E Oswald
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Characterizing the energetic states of the GluR2 ligand binding domain core-dimer.

Authors:  Michael Yonkunas; Maria Kurnikova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Configurational Preference of the Glutamate Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Dimers.

Authors:  Michael Yonkunas; Maiti Buddhadev; Jose C Flores Canales; Maria G Kurnikova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Structural basis for NHERF1 PDZ domain binding.

Authors:  Tatyana Mamonova; Maria Kurnikova; Peter A Friedman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Computational membrane biophysics: From ion channel interactions with drugs to cellular function.

Authors:  Williams E Miranda; Van A Ngo; Laura L Perissinotti; Sergei Yu Noskov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Origins of PDZ Binding Specificity. A Computational and Experimental Study Using NHERF1 and the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor.

Authors:  Tatyana Mamonova; Qiangmin Zhang; Mintu Chandra; Brett M Collins; Edward Sarfo; Zimei Bu; Kunhong Xiao; Alessandro Bisello; Peter A Friedman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  pH-triggered conformational switching of the diphtheria toxin T-domain: the roles of N-terminal histidines.

Authors:  Igor V Kurnikov; Alexander Kyrychenko; Jose C Flores-Canales; Mykola V Rodnin; Nikolay Simakov; Mauricio Vargas-Uribe; Yevgen O Posokhov; Maria Kurnikova; Alexey S Ladokhin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Structural landscape of isolated agonist-binding domains from single AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Christy F Landes; Anu Rambhadran; J Nick Taylor; Ferandre Salatan; Vasanthi Jayaraman
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 15.040

9.  The Hydrophobic Effect Contributes to the Closed State of a Simplified Ion Channel through a Conserved Hydrophobic Patch at the Pore-Helix Crossing.

Authors:  Michael Yonkunas; Maria Kurnikova
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Neurotransmitter Funneling Optimizes Glutamate Receptor Kinetics.

Authors:  Alvin Yu; Héctor Salazar; Andrew J R Plested; Albert Y Lau
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.