Literature DB >> 11806910

Molecular dynamics simulations of the ligand-binding domain of the ionotropic glutamate receptor GluR2.

Yalini Arinaminpathy1, Mark S P Sansom, Philip C Biggin.   

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors are essential for fast synaptic nerve transmission. Recent x-ray structures for the ligand-binding (S1S2) region of the GluR2 alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)-sensitive receptor have suggested how differences in protein/ligand interactions may determine whether a ligand will behave as a full agonist. We have used multiple molecular dynamics simulations of 2-5 ns duration to explore the structural dynamics of GluR2 S1S2 in the presence and absence of glutamate and in a complex with kainate. Our studies indicate that not only is the degree of domain closure dependent upon interactions with the ligand, but also that protein/ligand interactions influence the motion of the S2 domain with respect to S1. Differences in domain mobility between the three states (apo-S1S2, glutamate-bound, and kainate-bound) are surprisingly clear-cut. We discuss how these changes in dynamics may provide an explanation relating the mechanism of transmission of the agonist-binding event to channel opening. We also show here how the glutamate may adopt an alternative mode of binding not seen in the x-ray structure, which involves a key threonine (T480) side chain flipping into a new conformation. This new conformation results in an altered pattern of hydrogen bonding at the agonist-binding site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11806910      PMCID: PMC1301877          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75430-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  25 in total

1.  Dynamic coupling between the SH2 and SH3 domains of c-Src and Hck underlies their inactivation by C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation.

Authors:  M A Young; S Gonfloni; G Superti-Furga; B Roux; J Kuriyan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Subunit- and site-specific pharmacology of the NMDA receptor channel.

Authors:  T Yamakura; K Shimoji
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Heterogeneous conductance levels of native AMPA receptors.

Authors:  T C Smith; L Y Wang; J R Howe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Investigation of the mechanism of domain closure in citrate synthase by molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  D Roccatano; A E Mark; S Hayward
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Analysis of a 10-ns molecular dynamics simulation of mouse acetylcholinesterase.

Authors:  K Tai; T Shen; U Börjesson; M Philippopoulos; J A McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Structural similarities between glutamate receptor channels and K(+) channels examined by scanning mutagenesis.

Authors:  V A Panchenko; C R Glasser; M L Mayer
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Mutations in a putative agonist binding region of the AMPA-selective glutamate receptor channel.

Authors:  S Uchino; K Sakimura; K Nagahari; M Mishina
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1992-08-24       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 8.  Cloned glutamate receptors.

Authors:  M Hollmann; S Heinemann
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  A family of AMPA-selective glutamate receptors.

Authors:  K Keinänen; W Wisden; B Sommer; P Werner; A Herb; T A Verdoorn; B Sakmann; P H Seeburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Glutamate receptor channel signatures.

Authors:  R Sprengel; R Aronoff; M Völkner; B Schmitt; R Mosbach; T Kuner
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 14.819

View more
  22 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the ligand binding domain of mGluR1 in response to agonist and antagonist binding.

Authors:  Gabriele Costantino; Antonio Macchiarulo; Maxim Belenikin; Roberto Pellicciari
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Molecular dynamic simulation of the ligand-receptor complexes of the aminoterminal domain of the metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1.

Authors:  M S Belenikin; G Costantino; V A Palyulin; R Pellicciari; N S Zefirov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.788

3.  Filter flexibility and distortion in a bacterial inward rectifier K+ channel: simulation studies of KirBac1.1.

Authors:  Carmen Domene; Alessandro Grottesi; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Traynelis; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Chris J McBain; Frank S Menniti; Katie M Vance; Kevin K Ogden; Kasper B Hansen; Hongjie Yuan; Scott J Myers; Ray Dingledine
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Selectivity and cooperativity of modulatory ions in a neurotransmitter receptor.

Authors:  Ranjit Vijayan; Andrew J R Plested; Mark L Mayer; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Mechanism of partial agonism at the GluR2 AMPA receptor: Measurements of lobe orientation in solution.

Authors:  Alexander S Maltsev; Ahmed H Ahmed; Michael K Fenwick; David E Jane; Robert E Oswald
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Constitutive activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor via cleft-spanning disulfide bonds.

Authors:  Marie L Blanke; Antonius M J VanDongen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Collective dynamics of periplasmic glutamine binding protein upon domain closure.

Authors:  Hannes H Loeffler; Akio Kitao
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  A salt-bridge motif involved in ligand binding and large-scale domain motions of the maltose-binding protein.

Authors:  Thomas Stockner; Hans J Vogel; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Energetics of the cleft closing transition and the role of electrostatic interactions in conformational rearrangements of the glutamate receptor ligand binding domain.

Authors:  Tatyana Mamonova; Michael J Yonkunas; Maria G Kurnikova
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.