OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess differences in exercise counseling preferences, program preferences, and telephone/Internet access among breast cancer survivors based on exercise behavior and demographic, medical, social cognitive, and environmental factors. METHODS: A self-administered survey was returned by 192 breast cancer survivors. RESULTS: Participants were Caucasian (98%), and the mean age was 64+/-11.5 years. Participants preferring an exercise specialist were more likely to report current treatment, higher self-efficacy, greater perceived barriers, and a residential environment conducive to physical activity. Participants preferring face-to-face counseling and exercising outdoors were younger, and those preferring to exercise alone and at home reported lower social support. Low-intensity exercise was preferred by participants who were sedentary, obese, less self-efficacious, enjoyed exercise less, perceived greater barriers, and reported lower social support. Participants with Internet access were more apt to be younger with higher income and greater social support. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic, medical, social cognitive, and environmental factors might influence exercise preferences and Internet access. Future research assessing the effectiveness of tailoring interventions based on these factors is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess differences in exercise counseling preferences, program preferences, and telephone/Internet access among breast cancer survivors based on exercise behavior and demographic, medical, social cognitive, and environmental factors. METHODS: A self-administered survey was returned by 192 breast cancer survivors. RESULTS:Participants were Caucasian (98%), and the mean age was 64+/-11.5 years. Participants preferring an exercise specialist were more likely to report current treatment, higher self-efficacy, greater perceived barriers, and a residential environment conducive to physical activity. Participants preferring face-to-face counseling and exercising outdoors were younger, and those preferring to exercise alone and at home reported lower social support. Low-intensity exercise was preferred by participants who were sedentary, obese, less self-efficacious, enjoyed exercise less, perceived greater barriers, and reported lower social support. Participants with Internet access were more apt to be younger with higher income and greater social support. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic, medical, social cognitive, and environmental factors might influence exercise preferences and Internet access. Future research assessing the effectiveness of tailoring interventions based on these factors is warranted.
Authors: Ana M Abrantes; Cynthia L Battle; David R Strong; Eileen Ing; Mary Ella Dubreuil; Alan Gordon; Richard A Brown Journal: Ment Health Phys Act Date: 2011-12
Authors: Laura Q Rogers; Edward McAuley; Philip M Anton; Kerry S Courneya; Sandra Vicari; Patricia Hopkins-Price; Steven Verhulst; Robert Mocharnuk; Karen Hoelzer Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: D Santa Mina; A Petrella; K L Currie; K Bietola; S M H Alibhai; J Trachtenberg; P Ritvo; A G Matthew Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; David E Conroy; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Christine A Pellegrini; Gillian R Lloyd; Frank J Penedo; Bonnie Spring Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Laura Q Rogers; Stephen J Markwell; Kerry S Courneya; Edward McAuley; Steven Verhulst Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Errol J Philip; Elliot J Coups; Marc B Feinstein; Bernard J Park; Donna J Wilson; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: C F van Uden-Kraan; M J M Chinapaw; C H C Drossaert; I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; L M Buffart Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 3.603