Literature DB >> 18820289

Event congruency enhances episodic memory encoding through semantic elaboration and relational binding.

Bernhard P Staresina1, James C Gray, Lila Davachi.   

Abstract

Behavioral research consistently shows that congruous events, that is, events whose constituent elements match along some specific dimension, are better remembered than incongruous events. Although it has been speculated that this "congruency subsequent memory effect" (cSME) results from enhanced semantic elaboration, empirical evidence for this account is lacking. Here, we report a set of behavioral and neuroimaging experiments demonstrating that congruous events engage regions along the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG)--consistently related to semantic elaboration--to a significantly greater degree than incongruous events, providing evidence in favor of this hypothesis. Critically, we additionally report 3 novel findings in relation to event congruency: First, congruous events yield superior memory not only for a given study item but also for associated source details. Second, the cSME is evident not only for events that matched a semantic context but also for those that matched a subjective aesthetic schema. Finally, functional magnetic resonance imaging brain/behavior correlation analysis reveals a strong link between 1) across-subject variation in the magnitude of the cSME and 2) differential right hippocampal activation, suggesting that episodic memory for congruous events is effectively bolstered by the extent to which semantic associations are generated and relationally integrated via LIFG-hippocampal-encoding mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820289      PMCID: PMC2665161          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  32 in total

Review 1.  Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  N J Cohen; J Ryan; C Hunt; L Romine; T Wszalek; C Nash
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks.

Authors:  Brian T Gold; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  David Badre; Russell A Poldrack; E Juliana Paré-Blagoev; Rachel Z Insler; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Common and dissociable activation patterns associated with controlled semantic and phonological processing: evidence from FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Brian T Gold; Dave A Balota; Brenda A Kirchhoff; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall.

Authors:  Bernhard P Staresina; Lila Davachi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 8.  Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans.

Authors:  Lila Davachi
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Schemas and memory consolidation.

Authors:  Dorothy Tse; Rosamund F Langston; Masaki Kakeyama; Ingrid Bethus; Patrick A Spooner; Emma R Wood; Menno P Witter; Richard G M Morris
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  28 in total

1.  Retrieval of associative information congruent with prior knowledge is related to increased medial prefrontal activity and connectivity.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Mark Rijpkema; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Self-imagining enhances recognition memory in memory-impaired individuals with neurological damage.

Authors:  Matthew D Grilli; Elizabeth L Glisky
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain.

Authors:  Marlieke Tina Renée van Kesteren; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-05-01

4.  Memory for faces: the effect of facial appearance and the context in which the face is encountered.

Authors:  Katia Mattarozzi; Alexander Todorov; Maurizio Codispoti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-12

5.  Interaction between attentional systems and episodic memory encoding: the impact of conflict on binding of information.

Authors:  Marco Sperduti; Allan Armougum; Dominique Makowski; Philippe Blondé; Pascale Piolino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Do patients with schizophrenia benefit from a self-referential memory bias?

Authors:  Philippe-Olivier Harvey; Junghee Lee; William P Horan; Kevin Ochsner; Michael F Green
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Memory integration in amnesia: prior knowledge supports verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth Race; Daniela J Palombo; Margaret Cadden; Keely Burke; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Mind the gap: binding experiences across space and time in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Bernhard P Staresina; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Shaping memory accuracy by left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bastian Zwissler; Christoph Sperber; Sina Aigeldinger; Sebastian Schindler; Johanna Kissler; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Consolidation differentially modulates schema effects on memory for items and associations.

Authors:  Marlieke T R van Kesteren; Mark Rijpkema; Dirk J Ruiter; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.