Literature DB >> 18820164

Effects of slow-release urea on ruminal digesta characteristics and growth performance in beef steers.

C C Taylor-Edwards1, G Hibbard, S E Kitts, K R McLeod, D E Axe, E S Vanzant, N B Kristensen, D L Harmon.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of slow-release urea (SRU) versus feed-grade urea on ruminal metabolite characteristics in steers and DMI, gain, and G:F in growing beef steers. Experiment 1 used 12 ruminally cannulated steers (529 +/- 16 kg of BW) to monitor the behavior of SRU in the ruminal environment. Compared with feed-grade urea, SRU decreased ruminal ammonia concentration (P = 0.02) and tended to increase ruminal urease activity (P = 0.06) without affecting ruminal VFA molar proportions or total concentrations (P > 0.20). After 35 d of feeding, the in situ degradation rate of SRU was not different between animals fed urea or SRU (P = 0.48). Experiment 2 used 180 Angus-cross steers (330 +/- 2.3 kg) fed corn silage-based diets supplemented with urea or SRU for 56 d to evaluate the effects on feed intake, gain, and G:F. The design was a randomized complete block with a 2 x 4 + 1 factorial arrangement of treatments. Treatments included no supplemental urea (control) or urea or SRU at 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, or 1.6% of diet DM. Over the entire 56 d experiment, there were interactions of urea source x concentration for gain (P = 0.04) and G:F (P = 0.01) because SRU reduced ADG and G:F at the 0.4 and 1.6% supplementation concentrations but was equivalent to urea at the 0.8 and 1.2% supplementation concentrations; these effects were due to urea source x concentration interactions for gain (P = 0.06) and G:F (P = 0.05) during d 29 to 56 of the experiment. The SRU reduced DMI during d 29 to 56 (P = 0.01) but not during d 0 to 28, so that over the entire experiment there was no difference in DMI for urea source (P = 0.19). These collective results demonstrate that SRU releases N slowly in the rumen with no apparent adaptation within 35 d. Supplementation of SRU may limit N availability at low (0.4%) concentrations but is equivalent to urea at 0.8 and 1.2% concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18820164     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-0912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Diversity of the Intestinal Bacteria of Cattle Fed on Diets with Different Doses of Gelatinized Starch-Urea.

Authors:  Zhenliang Cui; Qingxiang Meng; Wei Ma; Xinzhuang Zhang; Zhenming Zhou; Liping Ren
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 2.  Ureases in the gastrointestinal tracts of ruminant and monogastric animals and their implication in urea-N/ammonia metabolism: A review.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra; Jörg Rudolf Aschenbach
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 10.479

3.  Functional Changes of the Community of Microbes With Ni-Dependent Enzyme Genes Accompany Adaptation of the Ruminal Microbiome to Urea-Supplemented Diets.

Authors:  Zhongyan Lu; Zhihui Xu; Lingmeng Kong; Hong Shen; Jörg R Aschenbach
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Effects of Combining Feed Grade Urea and a Slow-release Urea Product on Performance, Dietary Energetics and Carcass Characteristics of Feedlot Lambs Fed Finishing Diets with Different Starch to Acid Detergent Fiber Ratios.

Authors:  A Estrada-Angulo; M A López-Soto; C R Rivera-Méndez; B I Castro; F G Ríos; H Dávila-Ramos; A Barreras; J D Urías-Estrada; R A Zinn; A Plascencia
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Influence of polymer-coated slow-release urea on total tract apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation and performance of Nellore steers.

Authors:  R Gardinal; G D Calomeni; N R B Cônsolo; C S Takiya; J E Freitas; J R Gandra; T H A Vendramini; H N Souza; F P Rennó
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Slow-Release Urea Supplementation on the Performance of Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Saheed A Salami; Colm A Moran; Helen E Warren; Jules Taylor-Pickard
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Changes in the Solid-, Liquid-, and Epithelium-Associated Bacterial Communities in the Rumen of Hu Lambs in Response to Dietary Urea Supplementation.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; Chunlong Mu; Yixuan Xu; Junshi Shen; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.