Literature DB >> 1881843

The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System: design, questionnaire, data collection and response rates. PRAMS Working Group.

M M Adams1, H B Shulman, C Bruce, C Hogue, D Brogan.   

Abstract

The birth certificate, the primary tool for population-based surveillance of the condition of infants at birth and maternal status during pregnancy, provides little data about maternal behaviour during pregnancy. To collect data on maternal behaviours that influence pregnancy outcome, we implemented the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in seven states. For this population-based surveillance, new mothers were sampled from birth certificates 2 to 6 months after delivery and contacted by mail; follow-up of nonrespondents was by telephone. Participants completed a 10-page questionnaire. Stratification permitted over-sampling of women with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Among 10,563 women sampled during 1988 and 1989, stratum-specific response rates ranged from 30% to 89%. In 11 of the 28 strata, response rates were greater than 70%. Response rates varied considerably between states. Rates were lower for Black mothers, mothers of low birthweight infants, unmarried mothers and mothers with less than 12 years of education. Active refusal to participate and undelivered mail occurred infrequently. Mail and telephone surveillance of new mothers can yield adequate response rates in selected population groups. Trials of alternative approaches to enhancing response among Black and disadvantaged mothers, such as additional mailings or post-partum in-hospital recruitment, are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1881843     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1991.tb00718.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  30 in total

1.  Correlates of drinking during the third trimester of pregnancy in Alaska.

Authors:  K A Perham-Hester; B D Gessner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-09

2.  Pregnancy intention: how PRAMS data can inform programs and policy. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  C L Melvin; M Rogers; B C Gilbert; L Lipscomb; R Lorenz; S Ronck; S Casey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

3.  Adapting the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring survey to enhance locally available data: methods.

Authors:  Ann M Dozier; Elizabeth Brownell; Joseph Guido; Hongmei Yang; Cynthia A Howard; Andrew Doniger; Deborah Ossip; Ruth Lawrence
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

4.  Dental cleaning before and during pregnancy among Maryland mothers.

Authors:  Terri-Ann Thompson; Diana Cheng; Donna Strobino
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

5.  How can PRAMS survey response rates be improved among American Indian mothers? Data from 10 states.

Authors:  Shin Y Kim; Myra Tucker; Melissa Danielson; Christopher H Johnson; Pelagie Snesrud; Holly Shulman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-03-19

6.  Cigarette smoking and gestational diabetes mellitus in Hispanic woman.

Authors:  Tiffany A Moore Simas; Kathleen L Szegda; Xun Liao; Penelope Pekow; Glenn Markenson; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: findings from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 1996-1997. PRAMS Working Group. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  M M Goodwin; J A Gazmararian; C H Johnson; B C Gilbert; L E Saltzman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

9.  Violence during pregnancy: measurement issues.

Authors:  T J Ballard; L E Saltzman; J A Gazmararian; A M Spitz; S Lazorick; J S Marks
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy.

Authors:  G Barrett; S C Smith; K Wellings
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.