Literature DB >> 11097508

Pregnancy intention: how PRAMS data can inform programs and policy. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

C L Melvin1, M Rogers, B C Gilbert, L Lipscomb, R Lorenz, S Ronck, S Casey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In most states, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is the only source for state-specific, population-based data on the prevalence of unintended pregnancy among women having a live birth. These data can be used in a variety of ways to inform state policies and programs aimed at the prevention of unintended pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES: This paper highlights the programmatic and policy development activities undertaken by three states in relation to unintended pregnancy as well as the role that PRAMS data played in those efforts.
RESULTS: Georgia, Oklahoma, and Washington have used PRAMS data to gain support for program initiatives directed at unintended pregnancy, to promote policies aimed at either monitoring or reducing unintended pregnancy, and to acquire additional funds for related programs, such as family planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097508     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009579615114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  5 in total

1.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

2.  Prevalence of selected maternal and infant characteristics, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1997.

Authors:  B J Colley Gilbert; C H Johnson; B Morrow; M E Gaffield; I Ahluwalia
Journal:  MMWR CDC Surveill Summ       Date:  1999-09-24

3.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states.

Authors:  B C Gilbert; H B Shulman; L A Fischer; M M Rogers
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-12

4.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System: design, questionnaire, data collection and response rates. PRAMS Working Group.

Authors:  M M Adams; H B Shulman; C Bruce; C Hogue; D Brogan
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Medicaid costs of live births from unintended pregnancies in Florida.

Authors:  R S Hopkins; H Marshall; S Hoecherl
Journal:  J Fla Med Assoc       Date:  1995-08
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Adolescent pregnancy intentions and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal examination.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosengard; Maureen G Phipps; Nancy E Adler; Jonathan M Ellen
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Pregnancy intention and contraceptive use at six months postpartum among women with recent preterm delivery.

Authors:  Joan Rosen Bloch; David A Webb; Leny Mathew; Jennifer F Culhane
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012 May-Jun

3.  Feasibility Study of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Iran.

Authors:  Roghieh Kharaghani; Mohammad Shariati; Masud Yunesian; Afsaneh Keramat; Alireza Moghisi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Surveillance during pregnancy: methods and response rates from a hospital based pilot study of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda M O'Keeffe; Patricia M Kearney; Richard A Greene
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Comparing the order of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy and the Demographic and Health Survey question on pregnancy intention in a single group of postnatal women in Malawi - the effect of question order on assessment of pregnancy intention.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hall; Judith Stephenson; Geraldine Barrett
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-07-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.