Literature DB >> 1881734

Gestational age assessment in preterm neonates weighing less than 1500 grams.

M Sanders1, M Allen, G R Alexander, J Yankowitz, J Graeber, T R Johnson, M X Repka.   

Abstract

Postnatal assessment of gestational age in preterm neonates traditionally has been performed using the methods of Dubowitz and Ballard. This study was designed to determine the accuracy of these methods in a sample of very low birth weight preterm neonates. Dubowitz and Ballard examinations were done on 110 preterm neonates within the first 72 hours of life by a neonatologist masked to the gestational age assessed antenatally. Mean birth weight was 1066 +/- 256 g (SD). These data were compared with gestational age assessments using last menstrual period and best obstetric estimate calculated by an obstetrician unaware of the neonatal examination. Mean gestational age using last menstrual period was 28.3 +/- 2.9 weeks. Mean differences between last menstrual period and Dubowitz/Ballard were -2.8 +/- 2.1 weeks and -2.6 +/- 2.2 weeks, respectively. Results using best obstetric estimate were similar. An ophthalmologist examined lens vessels of 89 neonates. A similar pattern toward overestimation of gestational age interval by Dubowitz/Ballard was seen at each lens vessel grade. The Dubowitz and Ballard examinations are inaccurate methods of assessing gestational age in preterm neonates with birth weights less than 1500 g.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1881734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

1.  Gestational assessment assessed.

Authors:  U Wariyar; W Tin; E Hey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; T C Hulsey; J Mor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Optimal body temperature in transitional extremely low birth weight infants using heart rate and temperature as indicators.

Authors:  Robin B Knobel; Diane Holditch-Davis; Todd A Schwartz
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

4.  Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Sayan Das; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Arup Dutta; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Bruce Bedell; Saikat Deb; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Harshita Mittal; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Gestational dating by metabolic profile at birth: a California cohort study.

Authors:  Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Mary E Norton; Rebecca J Baer; Nicole Santos; George W Rutherford
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data.

Authors:  Anna K Knight; Jeffrey M Craig; Christiane Theda; Marie Bækvad-Hansen; Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm; Christine S Hansen; Mads V Hollegaard; David M Hougaard; Preben B Mortensen; Shantel M Weinsheimer; Thomas M Werge; Patricia A Brennan; Joseph F Cubells; D Jeffrey Newport; Zachary N Stowe; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Philippa Dalach; Lex W Doyle; Yuk J Loke; Andrea A Baccarelli; Allan C Just; Robert O Wright; Mara M Téllez-Rojo; Katherine Svensson; Letizia Trevisi; Elizabeth M Kennedy; Elisabeth B Binder; Stella Iurato; Darina Czamara; Katri Räikkönen; Jari M T Lahti; Anu-Katriina Pesonen; Eero Kajantie; Pia M Villa; Hannele Laivuori; Esa Hämäläinen; Hea Jin Park; Lynn B Bailey; Sasha E Parets; Varun Kilaru; Ramkumar Menon; Steve Horvath; Nicole R Bush; Kaja Z LeWinn; Frances A Tylavsky; Karen N Conneely; Alicia K Smith
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Extremely low birth weight preterm infants lack vasomotor response in relationship to cold body temperatures at birth.

Authors:  R B Knobel; D Holditch-Davis; T A Schwartz; J E Wimmer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Harshita Mittal; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Sayan Das; Bruce Bedell; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Arup Dutta; Saikat Deb; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.413

9.  Predicting gestational age using neonatal metabolic markers.

Authors:  Kelli K Ryckman; Stanton L Berberich; John M Dagle
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Anthropometric measures that identify premature and low birth weight newborns in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study with community follow-up.

Authors:  Netsanet Workneh Gidi; Melkamu Berhane; Tsinuel Girma; Alemseged Abdissa; Ruth Lim; Katherine Lee; Cattram Nguyen; Fiona Russell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.