Literature DB >> 18816284

How to accurately detect autobiographical events.

Giuseppe Sartori1, Sara Agosta, Cristina Zogmaister, Santo Davide Ferrara, Umberto Castiello.   

Abstract

We describe a new method, based on indirect measures of implicit autobiographical memory, that allows evaluation of which of two contrasting autobiographical events (e.g., crimes) is true for a given individual. Participants were requested to classify sentences describing possible autobiographical events by pressing one of two response keys. Responses were faster when sentences related to truly autobiographical events shared the same response key with other sentences reporting true events and slower when sentences related to truly autobiographical events shared the same response key with sentences reporting false events. This method has possible application in forensic settings and as a lie-detection technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18816284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02156.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  23 in total

1.  The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.

Authors:  Nicholas D Duran; Rick Dale; Danielle S McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Source confusion influences the effectiveness of the autobiographical IAT.

Authors:  Melanie K T Takarangi; Deryn Strange; Alexandra E Shortland; Hannah E James
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.

Authors:  Santo Davide Ferrara; Viviana Ananian; Eric Baccino; Rafael Boscolo-Berto; Ranieri Domenici; Claudio Hernàndez-Cueto; George Mendelson; Gian Aristide Norelli; Mohammed Ranavaya; Claudio Terranova; Duarte Nuno Vieira; Guido Viel; Enrique Villanueva; Riccardo Zoia; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  The current and future status of the concealed information test for field use.

Authors:  Izumi Matsuda; Hiroshi Nittono; John J B Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-27

5.  New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone.

Authors:  Andrea Petróczi; Tamás Nepusz; Paul Cross; Helen Taft; Syeda Shah; Nawed Deshmukh; Jay Schaffer; Maryann Shane; Christiana Adesanwo; James Barker; Declan P Naughton
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2011-08-03

6.  True and False DRM Memories: Differences Detected with an Implicit Task.

Authors:  Maddalena Marini; Sara Agosta; Giuliana Mazzoni; Gianfranco Dalla Barba; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-27

7.  Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Bruno Verschuere; Teresa Schuhmann; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Detecting cocaine use? The autobiographical implicit association test (aIAT) produces false positives in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Elisabeth Julie Vargo; Andrea Petróczi
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2013-06-14

9.  Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walczyk; Frank P Igou; Alexa P Dixon; Talar Tcholakian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01

10.  Learning to lie: effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying.

Authors:  B Van Bockstaele; B Verschuere; T Moens; Kristina Suchotzki; Evelyne Debey; Adriaan Spruyt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.