Literature DB >> 18815962

Direct comparisons of treatment modalities for youth disorders: a meta-analysis.

Scott Miller1, Bruce Wampold, Katelyn Varhely.   

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether differences in efficacy exist among treatment approaches applied to youth. Included were all studies published between 1980 and 2005 involving participants 18 years of age or younger with diagnoses of depression, anxiety, conduct disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder that contained direct comparisons among two or more treatment methods intended to be therapeutic. Effect sizes were found to vary significantly, providing some evidence that differences in efficacy exist among treatments for these disorders in youth. However, the upper bound of the true difference in effects among treatments was small. Furthermore, researcher allegiance was found to be strongly associated with the difference in effect sizes so that when allegiance was controlled there was no evidence of any differences among treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18815962     DOI: 10.1080/10503300701472131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Res        ISSN: 1050-3307


  13 in total

1.  How to prove that your therapy is effective, even when it is not: a guideline.

Authors:  P Cuijpers; I A Cristea
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 6.892

2.  Results of a pragmatic effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial of the Family Check-up in community mental health agencies.

Authors:  Justin D Smith; Elizabeth A Stormshak; Katherine Kavanagh
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-05

3.  Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: a systematic appraisal.

Authors:  Elena Dragioti; Ioannis Dimoliatis; Evangelos Evangelou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A systematic appraisal of allegiance effect in randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Elena Dragioti; Ioannis Dimoliatis; Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Evangelos Evangelou
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Children and Young People's Improving Access to Psychological Therapies: inspiring innovation or more of the same?

Authors:  Sami Timimi
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Non-diagnostic based approaches to helping children who could be labelled ADHD and their families.

Authors:  Sami Timimi
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2017-06

7.  Comparing bona fide psychotherapies of depression in adults with two meta-analytical approaches.

Authors:  Sarah R Braun; Bettina Gregor; Ulrich S Tran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Efficacy of immediate patient feedback in emergency psychiatry: a randomized controlled trial in a crisis intervention & brief therapy team.

Authors:  Flip Jan van Oenen; Suzy Schipper; Rien Van; Robert Schoevers; Irene Visch; Jaap Peen; Jack Dekker
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaus Lieb; Jan von der Osten-Sacken; Jutta Stoffers-Winterling; Neele Reiss; Jürgen Barth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  The relative efficacy of bona fide psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analytical evaluation of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ulrich S Tran; Bettina Gregor
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.