BACKGROUND: Radiochemotherapy has largely replaced surgery in the treatment for squamous cell cancer of the anal canal. Transanal ultrasonography is well documented as an important investigation method in the management of anal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of endoanal ultrasound in the study of the postradiation findings and to distinguish between postradiation fibrosis, residual tumor, and local recurrence. METHODS: The study enrolled 16 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven squamous carcinoma of the anal canal between 2003 and 2006. All the patients underwent a pretreatment and at least four posttreatment endosonographies, according to the follow-up period. All the patients were treated with the same radiochemotherapy protocol. RESULTS: Nine patients had stage uT2 disease; none had uT3 disease; and seven had uT4 disease. There was no evidence of residual tumor in the T2 group after treatment. In the T4 patients after treatment, ultrasound demonstrated tumor regression or abnormalities considered to be radiation-induced changes rather than residual diseases. Only for three patients was a posttreatment biopsy performed to evaluate recurrence (two uT2 and one uT4). Surgical treatment of recurrence was performed for two uT4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endoanal ultrasound is a safe and effective method for evaluating and following anal cancer before and after treatment. Experience and evaluation during the period of the ultrasonographic abnormalities could give a clear idea concerning the evolution of the anal tumors treated with radiochemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Radiochemotherapy has largely replaced surgery in the treatment for squamous cell cancer of the anal canal. Transanal ultrasonography is well documented as an important investigation method in the management of anal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of endoanal ultrasound in the study of the postradiation findings and to distinguish between postradiation fibrosis, residual tumor, and local recurrence. METHODS: The study enrolled 16 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven squamous carcinoma of the anal canal between 2003 and 2006. All the patients underwent a pretreatment and at least four posttreatment endosonographies, according to the follow-up period. All the patients were treated with the same radiochemotherapy protocol. RESULTS: Nine patients had stage uT2 disease; none had uT3 disease; and seven had uT4 disease. There was no evidence of residual tumor in the T2 group after treatment. In the T4 patients after treatment, ultrasound demonstrated tumor regression or abnormalities considered to be radiation-induced changes rather than residual diseases. Only for three patients was a posttreatment biopsy performed to evaluate recurrence (two uT2 and one uT4). Surgical treatment of recurrence was performed for two uT4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Endoanal ultrasound is a safe and effective method for evaluating and following anal cancer before and after treatment. Experience and evaluation during the period of the ultrasonographic abnormalities could give a clear idea concerning the evolution of the anal tumors treated with radiochemotherapy.
Authors: M Giovannini; V J Bardou; R Barclay; L Palazzo; G Roseau; T Helbert; P Burtin; O Bouché; B Pujol; O Favre Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Jo A Lund; Stein H Sundstrom; Rune Haaverstad; Arne Wibe; Morten Svinsaas; Helge E Myrvold Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2004-04-19 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Lisa Licitra; Silvia Spinazzé; Roberto Doci; T R Jeffry Evans; Gunnar Tanum; Michel Ducreux Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Guillermo P Sangster; David H Ballard; Miguel Nazar; Richard Tsai; Maren Donato; Horacio B D'Agostino Journal: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Date: 2018-07-29
Authors: Dieter Nuernberg; Adrian Saftoiu; Ana Paula Barreiros; Eike Burmester; Elena Tatiana Ivan; Dirk-André Clevert; Christoph F Dietrich; Odd Helge Gilja; Torben Lorentzen; Giovanni Maconi; Ismail Mihmanli; Christian Pallson Nolsoe; Frank Pfeffer; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Zeno Sparchez; Peter Vilmann; Jo Erling Riise Waage Journal: Ultrasound Int Open Date: 2019-02-05