OBJECTIVE: aim was to obtain elements for a differential diagnosis between post-radiation fibrosis and residual tumor or local relapse in anal canal cancer through detection of presence/absence of intralesional blood flow. Transrectal ultrasound and color Doppler were compared. METHODS: 43 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound sonography and color Doppler before and after therapy to assess intralesional blood flow and flow pattern (spotty and linear signals). All diagnostic imaging results were compared to histological analysis. Specificity was submitted to statistical analysis using McNemar test. RESULTS: before therapy 34 lesions (79%) showed color signal; no signal in 9 (21%), which were excluded from our analysis. Eighteen of the 34 patients considered, presented complete response to therapy, 14 partial response and two no response. After therapy, signal disappeared in 17 patients (94%); one false-positive (6%) presented spotty signals; 16 of 34 patients presented changed color signal. Color Doppler showed higher specificity than grey scale transrectal ultrasound in the differentiation of fibrosis from tumor. Response was confirmed by histological examination, considered gold standard. McNemar test demonstrated the significance of color Doppler (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: color Doppler considerably increases transrectal ultrasound specificity in differentiating tumor relapse from fibrosis in anal canal cancer.
OBJECTIVE: aim was to obtain elements for a differential diagnosis between post-radiation fibrosis and residual tumor or local relapse in anal canal cancer through detection of presence/absence of intralesional blood flow. Transrectal ultrasound and color Doppler were compared. METHODS: 43 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound sonography and color Doppler before and after therapy to assess intralesional blood flow and flow pattern (spotty and linear signals). All diagnostic imaging results were compared to histological analysis. Specificity was submitted to statistical analysis using McNemar test. RESULTS: before therapy 34 lesions (79%) showed color signal; no signal in 9 (21%), which were excluded from our analysis. Eighteen of the 34 patients considered, presented complete response to therapy, 14 partial response and two no response. After therapy, signal disappeared in 17 patients (94%); one false-positive (6%) presented spotty signals; 16 of 34 patients presented changed color signal. Color Doppler showed higher specificity than grey scale transrectal ultrasound in the differentiation of fibrosis from tumor. Response was confirmed by histological examination, considered gold standard. McNemar test demonstrated the significance of color Doppler (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: color Doppler considerably increases transrectal ultrasound specificity in differentiating tumor relapse from fibrosis in anal canal cancer.
Authors: Jyoti Parikh; Aidan Shaw; Lee A Grant; Alexis M P Schizas; Vivek Datta; Andrew B Williams; Nyree Griffin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-10-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Carrie Y Peterson; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Jose G Guillem; Garrett M Nash; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Sujata Patil; Larissa K Temple Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.585