Literature DB >> 18813077

Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathies secondary to argon laser iridotomy--preliminary results and usefulness of double-glide donor insertion technique.

Akira Kobayashi1, Hideaki Yokogawa, Kazuhisa Sugiyama.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Manipulation of the endothelial donor lamella in the anterior chamber during Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is often difficult, especially in cases with bullous keratopathies (BK) secondary to argon laser iridotomy (ALI). We developed a novel nonfolding donor insertion technique using a Busin glide and an intraocular lens (IOL) sheet glide and evaluated post-DSAEK outcomes for ALI-induced BK using several insertion techniques.
METHODS: Fourteen patients (mean age, 74.2 +/- 4.9 years) with ALI-induced BK underwent DSAEK; simultaneous cataract surgery was performed in 12 patients. Donor insertions were done by taco-folding (n = 4), spatula-assisted (n = 3), Busin glide-assisted (n = 2), and Busin glide/IOL glide-assisted methods (n = 5). Endothelial cell counts, postoperative visual acuity, induced astigmatism, and complications were examined over a mean follow-up period of 228.3 +/- 132.2 days (range 58-458 days).
RESULTS: In 1 case, DSAEK was converted to penetrating keratoplasty because of difficulties in donor insertion by the taco-folding method, resulting in vitreous prolapse. Overall, mean postoperative endothelial cell count was 1654.2 +/- 532.3 cells/mm2 (range 853-2610 cells/mm2), a 44.9% reduction compared with donor counts (mean 3003.3 +/- 425.5 cells/mm2). All patients reached acuity >20/40, with 3 (23.1%) reaching 20/20. Mean induced astigmatism in measurable cases was 0.53D +/- 0.38D. Although nonsignificant due to the small sample size, use of Busin glide with (37.9%) or without IOL glide (37.0%) tended to cause less endothelial damage than taco-folding (49.0%) or pull-through with spatula (44.2%) at 3 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: DSAEK is effective in eyes with ALI-induced BK. Our results suggest that insertion with a Busin glide is reliable and associated with less endothelial cell damage than the conventional taco-folding technique. Simultaneous use of IOL glide (Kobayashi double-glide method) to help prevent iris prolapse is our preferred insertion method for narrow-angle eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813077     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31817f38e9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  26 in total

1.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for microcornea.

Authors:  Hiroshi Toshida; Toshihiko Ohta; Akira Murakami; Akira Kobayashi; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Severe donor-related Candida keratitis after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Katsuya Yamazoe; Seika Den; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Yoichi Tanaka; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Examination of human meibum collection and extraction techniques.

Authors:  Kristina M Haworth; Jason J Nichols; Mirunalni Thangavelu; Loraine T Sinnott; Kelly K Nichols
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Daisuke Tomida; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Akiko Ogawa; Yumiko Hirayama; Seika Shimazaki-Den; Yoshiyuki Satake; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comparison of Descemet stripping under continuous air flow, manual air injection and balanced salt solution for DMEK: a pilot study.

Authors:  I E Gabbay; I Bahar; Y Nahum; E Livny
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Clinical evaluation of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK).

Authors:  Toshinori Masaki; Akira Kobayashi; Hideaki Yokogawa; Yoshiaki Saito; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Evaluation of factors affecting visual acuity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Shiro Amano; Akira Setogawa; Kenji Inoue
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Endothelial cell loss and graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty for laser iridotomy-induced bullous keratopathy.

Authors:  Naoki Okumura; Ayaka Kusakabe; Noriko Koizumi; Koichi Wakimasu; Kanae Kayukawa; Masami Kondo; Kazuhiko Mori; Chie Sotozono; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Suture pull-through insertion techniques for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Chinese phakic eyes: outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Ying Hong; Rong-Mei Peng; Miao Wang; Hong-Qiang Qu; Jing Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A sliding technique to load thin endothelial donor lamella onto Busin glide for Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Akira Kobayashi; Hideaki Yokogawa; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.