Literature DB >> 18812930

Spinal deformity: a new classification derived from neutral upright spinal alignment measurements in asymptomatic juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric individuals.

Charles Kuntz1, Christopher I Shaffrey, Stephen L Ondra, Atiq A Durrani, Praveen V Mummaneni, Linda S Levin, David B Pettigrew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this literature review, the authors analyze data from previously published studies that evaluated neutral upright spinal alignment (NUSA) from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic individuals. Based on the data for NUSA in asymptomatic volunteers, a new classification is proposed for spinal deformity.
METHODS: A review of the English literature was conducted to identify studies evaluating NUSA from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric volunteers. From the literature review, 17 angles and displacements were selected to depict neutral upright coronal and axial spinal alignment, and 21 angles and displacements were selected to depict neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment. Pooled estimates of the mean and variance were calculated for the angles and displacements from the articles that met inclusion criteria. A new classification of spinal deformity was then developed based on age-dependent NUSA; spinal abnormality; deformity curve location, pattern, magnitude, and flexibility; and global spinal alignment.
RESULTS: Despite a wide variation in the regional curves from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic volunteers, global spinal alignment is maintained in a narrow range for preservation of horizontal gaze and balance of the spine over the pelvis and femoral heads.
CONCLUSION: A new classification of spinal deformity is proposed that provides a structure for defining deformity of all patient ages and spinal abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18812930     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000313120.81565.D7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  12 in total

1.  Walking sagittal balance correction by pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adults with fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Shinjiro Kaneko; Yoshiyuki Yato; Takashi Asazuma; Masafumi Machida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Pediatric sagittal alignment.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Hubert Labelle; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Sagittal parameters of global cervical balance using EOS imaging: normative values from a prospective cohort of asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; H Demezon; S Aunoble
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

Authors:  Stefan Schmid; Katelyn A Burkhart; Brett T Allaire; Daniel Grindle; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A Comparative Study of Sagittal Balance in Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Authors:  Paulo Alvim Borges; Flávio Gerardo Benites Zelada; Thiago Felipe Dos Santos Barros; Olavo Biraghi Letaif; Ivan Dias da Rocha; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Tarcíso Eloy Pessoa Barros-Filho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases.

Authors:  W Thompson; A Cogniet; M Challali; R Saddiki; J Rigal; Jean Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The sagital balance in idiopatic and neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  Paulo Alvim Borges; Guilherme Pereira Ocampos; José Antonio Mancuso Filho; Olavo Biraghi Letaif; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis (TS-CL), the Cervical Answer to PI-LL, Defines Cervical Sagittal Deformity in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Osteotomy.

Authors:  Themistocles Protopsaltis; Jamie Terran; Alex Soroceanu; Michael J Moses; Nicolas Bronsard; Justin Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

9.  Comparison of radiological spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in skiers and non-athletes.

Authors:  Carl Todd; Peter Kovac; Anna Swärd; Cecilia Agnvall; Leif Swärd; Jon Karlsson; Adad Baranto
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The influence of sagittal profile alteration and final lordosis on the clinical outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A Delta-Omega-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Koeppen; Claudia Piepenbrock; Stefan Kroppenstedt; Mario Čabraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.