E M F van Sluijs1, A Page, Y Ommundsen, S J Griffin. 1. MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Box 285, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB20QQ, UK. esther.vansluijs@mrc-epid.com.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, behavioural and social correlates of objectively measured sedentary time in young people were identified. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). SETTING: Schools in Denmark, Estonia, Portugal and Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were invited using a twostage cluster sampling procedure. Analyses include 2107 children (9-10 years old) and adolescents (14-15 years old). ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Seven behavioural and 15 social variables assessed by parental and computerised child questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sedentary activity as assessed by accelerometry (10 min blocks at <200 counts/min). Analyses were stratified by country, and interactions with grade and sex were investigated. RESULTS: Adolescents were more sedentary than children (335.4 (90.4 min/day) vs 217.2 (75.6 min/day), p<0.001). Patterns of associations differed across countries. High computer use and no television viewing before school in Norway, and being sedentary during school breaks in Estonia were positively associated with sedentary time. No behavioural variables were associated with sedentary time in the Danish and Portuguese models. Socioeconomic position was positively associated with sedentary time in Portugal and Estonia, father's body mass index negatively in the Estonian model. Norwegian participants with a game console at home and Portuguese participants with a television in their bedroom were more sedentary. CONCLUSIONS: A single strategy aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour is unlikely to be effective across Europe as the target populations and behaviours of focus differ between countries. Targeting high socioeconomic groups in Portugal and Estonia or focusing on reducing computer use in Norway might be effective intervention strategies to reduce overall sedentary time.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, behavioural and social correlates of objectively measured sedentary time in young people were identified. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS). SETTING: Schools in Denmark, Estonia, Portugal and Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were invited using a twostage cluster sampling procedure. Analyses include 2107 children (9-10 years old) and adolescents (14-15 years old). ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Seven behavioural and 15 social variables assessed by parental and computerised child questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sedentary activity as assessed by accelerometry (10 min blocks at <200 counts/min). Analyses were stratified by country, and interactions with grade and sex were investigated. RESULTS: Adolescents were more sedentary than children (335.4 (90.4 min/day) vs 217.2 (75.6 min/day), p<0.001). Patterns of associations differed across countries. High computer use and no television viewing before school in Norway, and being sedentary during school breaks in Estonia were positively associated with sedentary time. No behavioural variables were associated with sedentary time in the Danish and Portuguese models. Socioeconomic position was positively associated with sedentary time in Portugal and Estonia, father's body mass index negatively in the Estonian model. Norwegian participants with a game console at home and Portuguese participants with a television in their bedroom were more sedentary. CONCLUSIONS: A single strategy aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour is unlikely to be effective across Europe as the target populations and behaviours of focus differ between countries. Targeting high socioeconomic groups in Portugal and Estonia or focusing on reducing computer use in Norway might be effective intervention strategies to reduce overall sedentary time.
Authors: Pooja Tandon; H Mollie Grow; Sarah Couch; Karen Glanz; James F Sallis; Lawrence D Frank; Brian E Saelens Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Alison M McMinn; Esther M F van Sluijs; Claire M Nightingale; Simon J Griffin; Derek G Cook; Chris G Owen; Alicja R Rudnicka; Peter H Whincup Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Allana G LeBlanc; Stephanie T Broyles; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Geneviève Leduc; Charles Boyer; Michael M Borghese; Mark S Tremblay Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Gregore I Mielke; Wendy J Brown; Ulf Ekelund; Soren Brage; Helen Gonçalves; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Ana M Menezes; Pedro C Hallal Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Andrew J Atkin; Kirsten Corder; Ulf Ekelund; Katrien Wijndaele; Simon J Griffin; Esther M F van Sluijs Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 3.240