Literature DB >> 23286454

Objectively measured sedentary behavior in preschool children: comparison between Montessori and traditional preschools.

Wonwoo Byun1, Steven N Blair, Russell R Pate.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior in children attending Montessori preschools with those attending traditional preschools.
METHODS: The participants in this study were preschool children aged 4 years old who were enrolled in Montessori and traditional preschools. The preschool children wore ActiGraph accelerometers. Accelerometers were initialized using 15-second intervals and sedentary behavior was defined as <200 counts/15-second. The accelerometry data were summarized into the average minutes per hour spent in sedentary behavior during the in-school, the after-school, and the total-day period. Mixed linear regression models were used to determine differences in the average time spent in sedentary behavior between children attending traditional and Montessori preschools, after adjusting for selected potential correlates of preschoolers' sedentary behavior.
RESULTS: Children attending Montessori preschools spent less time in sedentary behavior than those attending traditional preschools during the in-school (44.4. min/hr vs. 47.1 min/hr, P = 0.03), after-school (42.8. min/hr vs. 44.7 min/hr, P = 0.04), and total-day (43.7 min/hr vs. 45.5 min/hr, P = 0. 009) periods. School type (Montessori or traditional), preschool setting (private or public), socio-demographic factors (age, gender, and socioeconomic status) were found to be significant predictors of preschoolers' sedentary behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: Levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior were significantly lower among children attending Montessori preschools compared to children attending traditional preschools. Future research should examine the specific characteristics of Montessori preschools that predict the lower levels of sedentary behavior among children attending these preschools compared to children attending traditional preschools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23286454      PMCID: PMC3546897          DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act        ISSN: 1479-5868            Impact factor:   6.457


Background

The prevalence of childhood obesity in the U.S. has reached epidemic proportions in recent decades [1,2]. Importantly, this trend also has been observed among preschool children [3,4]. There is growing recognition that time spent in sedentary behavior (i.e., sitting, watching TV, and playing video games) is associated with an increased risk of childhood obesity [5-8]. However, levels of sedentary behavior have not been described well, especially in the preschool population, and the surveillance of sedentary behavior in preschool children is needed. Approximately 5.1 million children are enrolled in preschools or child care centers in the U.S. [9], and the majority spend more than 6 hours per day in these settings [10]. It is important, therefore, to monitor levels of sedentary behavior in the preschool setting. However, quantifying levels of sedentary behavior in young children is challenging due to their intermittent movement patterns and inability to recall past behavior [11]. Our research team has described preschoolers’ sedentary behavior levels during preschool hours, using accelerometry and a direct observation system [12,13]. The majority of their time was spent in sedentary behavior during preschool hours (42.1 min/hr or >80% of the observations). It was also observed that preschooler’s sedentary behavior levels varied by school policies and characteristics [14,15]. However, those studies only included samples of children attending traditional preschools, and to the best of our knowledge no study has described the levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior in children attending Montessori preschools, which have become popular in recent years [16,17]. The popularity of Montessori preschools likely reflects their unique approach in terms of children’s education. At least two-thirds of the preschool hours are devoted to opportunities for self-chosen/directed activities, [18] and children attending Montessori preschools are allowed to freely move about during the course of the day [19]. This likely provides more opportunities for ambulation compared to traditional preschools, [20] and may reduce the time spent in sedentary behavior. Therefore, we suspected that levels of sedentary behavior among children attending Montessori preschools might differ from those of children attending traditional preschools. The purpose of this study was to compare the levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior in children attending Montessori preschools with those of children attending traditional preschools.

Methods

Study design

A cross-sectional study design was used. Preschool children were recruited from traditional and Montessori preschools in metropolitan Columbia, South Carolina. Trained data collectors recorded arrival times and departure times from the schools every day in order to distinguish in-school sedentary behavior from after-school sedentary behavior. Each child’s daily sedentary behavior data were summarized by time of day: in-school, after-school, and total-day.

Participants

The participants were preschool children aged 4 years old who were enrolled in 8 traditional and 9 Montessori preschools. All traditional and Montessori preschools were identified according to following criteria: 1) the school is licensed as a child care center by the Department of Social Services, 2) the curriculum meets state standards, and 3) the teachers have degrees in early childhood education. Montessori preschools had to meet following additional criteria to be invited in the current study: 1) the school is accredited or a member of national Montessori associations and 2) the teachers have a certification of Montessori teaching. The number of participants per preschool ranged from 21 to 33 in traditional preschools, and from 19 to 62 in Montessori preschools. Children with missing data for study variables were removed, and the following data were available for analyses: in-school sedentary behavior (N=167 in traditional and N=164 in Montessori), after-school sedentary behavior (N=137 in traditional and N=135 in Montessori), and total-day sedentary behavior (N=137 in traditional and N=136 in Montessori). Written informed consent was obtained from children’s parents or guardians prior to collection of data. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of South Carolina.

Accelerometer protocol

The preschool children wore ActiGraph accelerometers (ActiGraph model GT1M, Shalimar, FL). The accelerometers were initialized to collect data in 15-second intervals (epochs) to account for the spontaneous activity patterns of preschool children. The accelerometers were attached to the child’s right hip (anterior to the iliac crest) using an elastic belt. Each child was instructed to wear the accelerometer for five consecutive school days (Monday – Friday), and their parents received information about how to wear and remove the accelerometer during after-school hours. Trained staff checked each child’s accelerometer at the beginning of each school day. If a child was not wearing the accelerometer upon arrival at preschool, a temporary monitor was provided to collect in-school sedentary behavior.

Sedentary behavior

Accelerometers collect and store count data according to movement frequency and intensity. Cutpoints were applied to the count data to determine the time spent in sedentary behavior. In the present study, a cutpoint of < 200 counts/15 seconds was used to define sedentary behavior. This cutpoint was developed specifically for preschool children (3 to 5 years) [21]. Using each child’s wear time as the divisor, cumulative time spent in sedentary behavior was averaged on an hourly basis (min/hr). This was to take into account differences in the monitoring times of children on a given day, and therefore allowed for comparisons to be made across preschools. Sixty-minutes of consecutive zeros was considered as non-wear time [22-24]. Due to variations in actual in-school hours among preschools, children have worn the accelerometer for at least 50% of school hours to be included in the in-school and total-day analysis. For the after-school and total-day analysis, children had to wear the accelerometer for at least 4 hours during the after-school period. Days that children were absent from preschool and days on which total wear time was ≥18 hours (i.e., monitor malfunction) were excluded from the analysis because those days do not represent typical days. It has been suggested that three or more days of accelerometry monitoring provides reliable measures of accelerometry-derived sedentary behavior in preschool children (intraclass correlations ≥ 0.80), [25] thus children who had at least 3 valid days of in-school and total day sedentary behavior were included in the present study.

Demographic and anthropometric characteristics

Children’s age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) were reported by a parent or guardian using a parent survey. Parent education level was measured as a surrogate indicator of socioeconomic status. Child’s participation in after-school sports program (i.e., number of times played per month) also was reported by a parent or guardian. Child’s weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using an electronic scale, and height was measured to the nearest 1 mm using a stadiometer, after children removed their shoes and outer clothing. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated (kg/m2) from the averages of height and weight.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics (mean and SD; frequency and percent) for the participants were calculated according to activity monitored during the different times of the day. Independent sample t-tests and Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in demographic and anthropometric variables between traditional and Montessori preschools. The differences in time spent in sedentary behavior between children attending traditional preschools and those attending Montessori preschools were determined using mixed linear regression models that included age, gender, race, parent education level, BMI, accelerometer wear time (hours/day), and preschool funding type (private or public) as covariates. For after-school and total-day sedentary behavior, after-school sports participation was additionally included as a covariate. Preschool was included as a random effect in the mixed models to take into account correlations among children from the same preschool. Mixed linear regression models also were used to determine if the covariates influenced time spent in sedentary behavior. The following covariates were included as independent variables: school type (Montessori or traditional), age, gender, race, BMI, parent education level, preschool funding type, and child’s participation in after-school sports program. The pseudo-R2 was calculated to determine the fraction of variance explained by the model [26]. All data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Descriptive characteristics

Children attending Montessori preschools were predominantly white and more likely to have parents with higher education levels, compared to children attending traditional preschools (Table 1). Children attending Montessori preschools participated more frequently in organized sports than those attending traditional preschools (Table 1). BMI was slightly lower among the children attending Montessori preschools, compared to those attending traditional preschools. The average number of days and hours per day that the children wore accelerometers during the in-school, after-school, and total-day period were similar between children attending traditional preschool and those attending Montessori preschools (Table 1).
Table 1

Descriptive characteristics of participants, Mean ± SD or percent

CharacteristicsIn-school Activity
After-school Activity
Total-day Activity
MontessoriTraditionalMontessoriTraditionalMontessoriTraditional
N
164
167
135
137
136
137
Age (years)
4.4 ± 0.5
4.5 ± 0.4
4.4 ± 0.6
4.5 ± 0.3
4.4 ± 0.6
4.5 ± 0.3
Gender (%)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Boys
49.4
52.6
48.9
53.2
49.0
53.2
Girls
50.6
47.4
51.1
46.8
51.0
46.8
Race (%)*
 
 
 
 
 
 
African American
23.2
43.1
25.2
43.1
25.0
43.1
White
66.4
37.1
65.9
37.2
66.2
37.2
Other
10.4
19.8
8.9
19.7
8.8
19.7
Preschool setting (%)*
 
 
 
 
 
 
Private
64.6
34.7
61.5
42.6
61.5
42.6
Public
35.4
65.3
38.5
57.4
38.5
57.4
BMI (kg/m2)*
15.9 ± 1.7
16.3 ± 2.0
15.9 ± 1.8
16.2 ± 1.9
15.9 ± 1.8
16.2 ± 1.9
Wear Time
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Days
4.8 ± 0.6
4.6 ± 0.6
3.7 ± 0.5
3.7 ± 0.6
3.7 ± 0.5
3.7 ± 0.6
Hours per Day5.8 ± 1.25.9 ± 1.16.4 ± 1.46.5 ± 1.512.2 ± 1.112.4 ± 1.3

*Significantly different between traditional and Montessori preschools (P <.05).

†Percentage of preschool children attending private or public preschools.

‡Number of days and number of hours that children wore accelerometers.

Descriptive characteristics of participants, Mean ± SD or percent *Significantly different between traditional and Montessori preschools (P <.05). †Percentage of preschool children attending private or public preschools. ‡Number of days and number of hours that children wore accelerometers.

Sedentary behavior between Montessori and traditional preschools

Overall, children attending Montessori preschools spent less time in sedentary behavior than those attending traditional preschools during the in-school period, after adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, parent education level, preschool setting, and preschools (Table 2). Also, children attending Montessori preschools spent less time in sedentary behavior than those attending traditional preschools during the after-school and the total-day period (Table 2). The lower time spent in sedentary behavior in Montessori preschools also remained after further adjusting for child’s participation in after-school sports program (Table 2). Among all subgroups of children (gender, race/ethnicity, parental education level or preschool funding type) those attending Montessori preschools engaged in less sedentary behavior than those attending traditional preschools.
Table 2

Time spent in sedentary behavior in children attending Montessori and traditional preschool (Mean ± SE)

 Sedentary Behavior (min/hr)
In-school
After-school
Total-day
MontessoriTraditionalP*MontessoriTraditionalP*MontessoriTraditionalP*
Total group
44.4 ± 0.9
47.1 ± 0.9
0.03
42.8 ± 0.8
44.7 ± 0.7
0.04
43.7 ± 0.5
45.5 ± 0.4
0.009
Gender
Boys
43.5 ± 0.9
46.0 ± 0.9
0.04
41.7 ± 1.1
44.3 ± 1.1
0.09
42.9 ± 0.7
44.8 ± 0.7
0.03
Girls
45.4 ± 1.0
47.8 ± 0.9
0.06
43.8 ± 0.9
45.5 ± 0.8
0.08
44.2 ± 0.6
46.1 ± 0.5
0.007
Race
African American
43.0 ± 1.2
46.7 ± 1.3
0.02
42.8 ± 1.2
46.6 ± 1.2
0.01
42.8 ± 0.6
45.7 ± 0.6
0.003
White
44.9 ± 0.8
47.4 ± 0.8
0.01
41.1 ± 0.9
42.7 ± 0.8
0.09
43.8 ± 0.6
45.3 ± 0.6
0.02
Other
45.3 ± 1.5
45.3 ± 1.1
0.87
44.0 ± 2.9
43.8 ± 2.4
0.96
44.0 ± 1.2
44.8 ± 0.8
0.59
Parent education
≤ College
45.6 ± 1.8
47.0 ± 1.3
0.51
42.1 ± 2.8
44.1 ± 1.3
0.52
43.2 ± 1.4
44.1 ± 1.1
0.55
> College
44.8 ± 0.6
47.2 ± 0.7
0.01
43.6 ± 056
45.8 ± 0.6
<.001
44.3 ± 0.4
46.4 ± 0.5
<.001
Preschool setting
Private
44.5 ± 0.8
49.0 ± 0.9
<.001
41.5 ± 0.9
43.6 ± 0.9
0.008
42.7 ± 0.6
45.1 ± 0.4
0.002
Public46.3 ± 1.545.8 ± 1.20.8244.0 ± 1.545.8 ± 1.30.3845.1 ± 0.545.6 ± 0.50.47

Estimated times spent in sedentary behaviors are least-square means and SE adjusted for age, gender, race, BMI, parent education level, accelerometer wear time, preschool setting, sports participation, and preschools as appropriated.

*P values for the difference between Traditional and Montessori preschool.

Time spent in sedentary behavior in children attending Montessori and traditional preschool (Mean ± SE) Estimated times spent in sedentary behaviors are least-square means and SE adjusted for age, gender, race, BMI, parent education level, accelerometer wear time, preschool setting, sports participation, and preschools as appropriated. *P values for the difference between Traditional and Montessori preschool.

Multivariate analyses for the prediction of sedentary behavior

School type and gender were found to be significant predictors of in-school, after-school, and total-day sedentary behavior (Table 3). Age and race were significant predictors of in-school sedentary behavior (Table 3). Parent education level was a significant predictor of total-day sedentary behavior, and preschool funding type was a significant predictor of after-school sedentary behavior. Total variances in sedentary behavior explained by the mixed model were 48%, 22%, and 34% for in-school, after-school, and total-day, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3

Results of multivariate regression analysis for prediction of sedentary behavior in preschool children

Independent variablesSedentary Behavior (min/hr)
In-school
After-school
Total-day
β (SE)FPβ (SE)FPβ (SE)FP
Intercept
52.1 (3.12)
-
<.001
47.8 (4.59)
-
<.001
50.7 (2.72)
-
<.001
School type (0 = Traditional, 1 = Montessori)
−2.70 (1.22)
4.80
.03
−1.83 (0.87)
4.36
.04
−1.72 (0.64)
6.90
.009
Age
−1.01 (0.44)
5.19
.02
0.12 (0.69)
0.03
.77
−0.45 (0.40)
1.23
.26
Gender 0 = girls, 1 = boys)
−1.45 (0.41)
12.7
<.001
−1.94 (0.63)
9.40
.003
−1.47 (0.37)
15.7
<.001
Race (0 = White, 1 = African American)
−1.23 (0.56)
2.57
.03
0.90 (0.81)
1.03
.27
−0.71 (0.49)
1.19
0.15
(0 = Other, 1 = White)
0.17 (0.67)
.80
1.06 (1.03)
.30
0.04 (0.59)
0.95
(0 = Other, 1 = African American)
−1.06 (0.69)
.12
0.16 (1.01)
.87
−0.68 (0.62)
0.27
BMI
0.06 (0.11)
0.29
.59
−0.07 (0.18)
0.16
.69
−0.09 (0.10)
0.87
.35
Parent education (0 = ≤ College, 1 = > College)
0.54 (0.61)
0.77
.38
1.88 (0.93)
2.87
.09
1.28 (0.54)
5.50
.02
Preschool setting (0 = Public, 1 = Private)
−0.16 (1.24)
0.02
.89
−2.10 (0.90)
5.41
.03
−1.05 (0.53)
3.83
.05
After-school sports participation (0 = < 3 times/mth, 1 = ≥ 3 times/mth)
−0.07 (0.20)
0.13
.71
−0.20 (0.78)
0.07
.89
−0.53 (0.46)
1.32
.25
R2 (MCCC), %0.480.220.34

MCCC, maximum cross-correlation coefficient [26].

Results of multivariate regression analysis for prediction of sedentary behavior in preschool children MCCC, maximum cross-correlation coefficient [26].

Discussion

This is the first study to describe and compare levels of objectively-measured sedentary behavior between children attending Montessori and traditional preschools. We found that the average time spent in sedentary behavior was significantly lower among children attending Montessori preschools. Not only did these children spend less time in sedentary behavior while in school, they also spent less time in sedentary behavior while out of school. Our findings are of particular importance because they suggest that the Montessori education system needs to be studied carefully to determine the specific factors that facilitate lower time spent in sedentary behavior. In addition to the finding that school type was a significant predictor of sedentary behavior, we also observed that socio-demographic factors (age, gender, and parent education level), and preschool funding type predicted time spent in sedentary behavior in multivariate analysis. These findings suggest that socio-demographic characteristics and school-level characteristics (e.g., policies and environments) have a significant influence on preschoolers’ sedentary behavior. Both characteristics should be considered when developing interventions that aim to reduce the time preschoolers’ spend in sedentary behavior. There is evidence that preschool policies and practices can influence preschoolers’ sedentary behavior. Previous studies found that children attending preschools with policies regarding sedentary opportunities (e.g., limiting time for prolonged sitting and TV/DVD viewing) spent significantly less time in sedentary behavior compared to those attending preschools without such policies [14,27]. The Montessori education system is based on a fundamental approach that encourages children to teach themselves, with teachers serving as assistants in the classroom [28]. Unlike traditional preschools, children in Montessori classrooms are not required to sit and listen to teacher-directed instructions, but are encouraged to choose and participate in individual or group activities [29]. This approach likely explains a proportion of variance in preschoolers’ sedentary behavior. Traditional preschools could consider if it is feasible to include aspects of this policy to reduce time spent in sedentary behavior. Research also suggests that preschoolers’ sedentary behavior levels are affected by the physical and social environment of the preschool. Children attending preschools with environments that discourage sedentary behavior (e.g., fewer TVs and computers or greater classroom size) have been shown to spend less time in sedentary behavior while in school [15,27]. The Montessori preschool environments are based on the theory that “the best learning is active” and that children learn within “prepared environments” in which they can freely perform self-directed activities [29]. In general, the Montessori school classrooms are large and open-spaced to facilitate children’s movement [29]. As an example, Montessori preschool classrooms typically are equipped with sets of materials for light intensity physical activities (e.g., materials for sweeping, dusting, cleaning, and gardening), and children are regularly engaged in physical activities using those materials in school [28,29]. This could explain our observed difference in sedentary behavior during the in-school period. An interesting observation in this study was that children attending Montessori preschools also spent less time in sedentary behavior out of school, compared to children attending traditional preschools. This out-of-school sedentary behavior difference persisted even after adjusting for child’s socioeconomic status and participation in after-school sports program. This finding is of particular interest because it has been hypothesized that children who are more sedentary (or active) during one part of the day would compensate at other times of the day, resulting in daily total activity levels that are constant [30]. Under the compensation hypothesis, environmental influences on children’s sedentary behavior is limited, and biological control of sedentary behavior is predominant [31]. However, our data do not support this hypothesis, but rather suggest that school-based interventions should be developed and implemented to reduce daily sedentary behavior in preschool children. It is also possible that the difference in after-school school sedentary behavior could be due to a carry-over effect, whereby the Montessori school policies and environments also influence children’s sedentary behavior out of school. In general, Montessori preschoolers are encouraged to perform various types of light physical activity during their attendance at school [32]. Such activities include serving snacks, washing the floor, dusting tables, watering plants, and going outside to collect leaves [29,32]. Therefore, it is possible that children continue to perform these types of light physical activities outside of school. In addition, parents who send their children to Montessori schools are encouraged to limit the use of strollers and other carriers, and the children of parents who follow this encouragement may spend less time in sedentary behavior [32]. Alternatively, although we adjusted for numerous potential correlates of sedentary behavior in preschool children (e.g., child’s socio-demographic factors, BMI, and sports participation), [22,33,34] the observed difference in sedentary behavior out of school could be due to factors such as neighborhood environments (e.g., hills in neighborhood and crime/safety), [35,36] home environments and policy (e.g., number of TVs/computers, TV/computer in child’s bedroom, and parent rules on screen time), [37-40] and parental behaviors (e.g., parent screen time) [33,41]. Future research is required to explore whether Montessori preschool policies continue to reduce sedentary behavior after the child has left the school environment. To our knowledge, only one previous intervention study has been designed to reduce sedentary behavior in preschool children [42]. However, that intervention was designed to reduce TV viewing at home, and did not intervene to reduce overall sedentary behavior in preschool children. In general, opportunities to move freely in the traditional preschool classroom are limited. This is likely due to early childhood educators being encouraged to employ formal curricula, which focus primarily on cognitive and language-oriented academic achievement [43,44]. However, this approach may not be optimal for raising academic achievement [45-47]. Research suggests that children attending Montessori schools have higher test scores in math and science compared to children attending traditional preschools [48,49]. Considering these data and our observations, it appears that the Montessori education system can be a strategy to reduce sedentary behavior, while also allowing for high academic achievement. The current study had strengths and limitations that should be acknowledged. A major strength of this study was the use of an objective measure of sedentary behavior. Due to the poor recall ability and sporadic activity patterns of young children, assessing the time spent in sedentary behavior in preschoolers is difficult. We quantified, using accelerometers, the levels of sedentary behavior in preschool children across the in-school, after-school, and total-day period. In addition, our samples of preschool children were drawn from both private and public preschools. However, the generalizability of our findings may be limited because participants of this study were volunteers from preschools, and all participants were recruited from one geographic location in the southeast U.S.

Conclusions

Results from this study showed that levels of sedentary behavior were significantly lower among children attending Montessori preschools compared to children attending traditional preschools. The lower levels of sedentary behavior were observed both in and out of school. These findings imply that the policies and environments of the Montessori preschool have the potential to influence the time preschoolers spend in sedentary behavior. Future research should be conducted to identify the specific policies and environmental factors of the Montessori preschool that discourage preschoolers’ sedentary behavior.

Abbreviations

SES: Socioeconomic status; BMI: Body mass index.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

WB contributed to the concept and design, drafting, revision, interpretation of the data, and supervision. SNB and RRP contributed to the study hypotheses, refining the data analyses, interpreting results, drafting the manuscript, and revising it through multiple drafts. All authors have read and approved submission of the manuscript.
  34 in total

1.  Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  E F Vonesh; V M Chinchilli; K Pu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Long-term effects of four preschool programs: ninth- and tenth-grade results.

Authors:  L B Miller; R P Bizzell
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-08

3.  Factors that affect television viewing time in preschool and primary schoolchildren.

Authors:  Siddika Songül Yalçin; Belma Tugrul; NazIre Naçar; Murat Tuncer; Kadriye Yurdakök
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.524

4.  Psychosocial and environmental correlates of adolescent sedentary behaviors.

Authors:  Gregory J Norman; Béatrice A Schmid; James F Sallis; Karen J Calfas; Kevin Patrick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Tracking of activity and sedentary behaviors in childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Janz; Trudy L Burns; Steven M Levy
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Prevalence, correlates, and trajectory of television viewing among infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Laura K Certain; Robert S Kahn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Physical activity among children attending preschools.

Authors:  Russell R Pate; Karin A Pfeiffer; Stewart G Trost; Paula Ziegler; Marsha Dowda
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Influences of preschool policies and practices on children's physical activity.

Authors:  Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate; Stewart G Trost; M Joăo C A Almeida; John R Sirard
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2004-06

9.  Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The level and tempo of children's physical activities: an observational study.

Authors:  R C Bailey; J Olson; S L Pepper; J Porszasz; T J Barstow; D M Cooper
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  10 in total

1.  Physical activity in preschool children: comparison between Montessori and traditional preschools.

Authors:  Russell R Pate; Jennifer R O'Neill; Wonwoo Byun; Kerry L McIver; Marsha Dowda; William H Brown
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.118

2.  Weekly trends in preschoolers' physical activity and sedentary time in childcare.

Authors:  Leigh M Vanderloo; Patricia Tucker
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Physical activity and sedentary time among preschoolers in centre-based childcare: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kathleen T O'Brien; Leigh M Vanderloo; Brianne A Bruijns; Stephanie Truelove; Patricia Tucker
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  International Comparison of the Levels and Potential Correlates of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity among Three-to-Four-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Kaiseree I Dias; James White; Russell Jago; Greet Cardon; Rachel Davey; Kathleen F Janz; Russell R Pate; Jardena J Puder; John J Reilly; Ruth Kipping
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael M Tassitano; R Glenn Weaver; Maria Cecília M Tenório; Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  The impact of new government childcare accreditation standards on children's in-care physical activity and sedentary time.

Authors:  Valerie Carson; Zhiguang Zhang; Nicholas Kuzik; Kristi B Adamo; Madison Predy; Mitchell Crozier; Stephen Hunter; Nancy Ogden; Gary S Goldfield; Anthony D Okely
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Which Meso-Level Characteristics of Early Childhood Education and Care Centers Are Associated with Health, Health Behavior, and Well-Being of Young Children? Findings of a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Raphael M Herr; Katharina Diehl; Sven Schneider; Nina Osenbruegge; Nicole Memmer; Steffi Sachse; Stephanie Hoffmann; Benjamin Wachtler; Max Herke; Claudia R Pischke; Anna Novelli; Jennifer Hilger-Kolb
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Prevalence and influences of preschoolers' sedentary behaviors in early learning centers: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Patricia Tucker; Leigh M Vanderloo; Shauna M Burke; Jennifer D Irwin; Andrew M Johnson
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Sedentary Behavior in Preschoolers: How Many Days of Accelerometer Monitoring Is Needed?

Authors:  Wonwoo Byun; Michael W Beets; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Wearable Technology-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Preschoolers: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Wonwoo Byun; Erica Y Lau; Timothy A Brusseau
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.