Literature DB >> 18811343

A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution.

L D Harder1, W G Wilson.   

Abstract

Given the predominance of outcrossing by angiosperms, large costs must often overwhelm the genetic benefit of selfing derived from contributing two haploid genomes to each off-spring rather than one. In addition to the well-studied genetic cost of inbreeding depression, selfing imposes a mating cost whenever self-pollination reduces opportunities for pollen export. Because self-pollination is a heterogeneous process, pollen discounting and its evolutionary consequences vary with pollination conditions. In this article we model self-pollination as comprising discounting and nondiscounting components, and we consider the consequences of this heterogeneity for outcross siring success. Aided by this depiction of pollination, we then compare previous theoretical representations of pollen discounting and consider their relative virtues. Finally, we consider conditions that would allow a population to be invaded by a variant with different pollination characteristics. This analysis exposes the pollination conditions implicit in standard results of mating system theory. It also identifies associations between four possible changes in pollination expected in different reproductive environments, including the incidence of positive or negative correlations between self-pollination and pollen export. These results emphasize the benefits of expanding the theory of plant reproduction to recognize explicitly when and how pollination mechanisms affect mating outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18811343     DOI: 10.1086/286199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  21 in total

1.  Selection against males in Caenorhabditis elegans under two mutational treatments.

Authors:  Diogo Manoel; Sara Carvalho; Patrick C Phillips; Henrique Teotónio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex in advertising: dioecy alters the net benefits of attractiveness in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae).

Authors:  Jana C Vamosi; Steven M Vamosi; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Randall J Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Large pollen loads of a South African asclepiad do not interfere with the foraging behaviour or efficiency of pollinating honey bees.

Authors:  G Coombs; A P Dold; E I Brassine; C I Peter
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-06-28

Review 6.  Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts.

Authors:  Pamela K Diggle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Maintenance of mixed mating after the loss of self-incompatibility in a long-lived perennial herb.

Authors:  Marie Voillemot; John R Pannell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Limited phenological and pollinator-mediated isolation among selfing and outcrossing Arabidopsis lyrata populations.

Authors:  Courtney E Gorman; Lindsay Bond; Mark van Kleunen; Marcel E Dorken; Marc Stift
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Dynamics of secondary pollen presentation in Campanula medium (Campanulaceae).

Authors:  Marco D'Antraccoli; Francesco Roma-Marzio; Giovanni Benelli; Angelo Canale; Lorenzo Peruzzi
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.